Business Requirements Comparisons Selection Results
BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS RESULTSThe Comparison Details
Executive Summary
Once the business requirements had been agreed we undertook a comparison of the potential options available to us.
Three options are currently available for us to use.
- Serengeti
- SharePoint and
- WIKI
Service Management specialists (an individual for each system) then worked through the requirements for document management application.
The results of their findings are in the table below.
Summary of Overall Findings | Serengeti | SharePoint | WIKI |
Exceeds Criterion | 0 | 27 | 0 |
Meets Criterion | 71 | 62 | 64 |
Almost Meets Criterion | 14 | 1 | 17 |
Criterion Not Met | 3 | 0 | 17 |
NOT ANSWERED | 7 | 8 | 0 |
OVERALL POINTS | 156 | 206 | 145 |
Section 5 of the business requirements have been extracted here to provide a comparison between the potential systems available at the University.
Below we have analysed the potential systems ability to meet the defined business requirements. In addition here is the scoring mechanism we have used to determine our recommended solution:
Scores | Description |
3 | Exceeds Criterion |
2 | Meets Criterion |
1 | Almost Meets Criterion |
0 | Criterion Not Met |
x | NOT ANSWERED |
Requirements with the comparative scores of Serengeti, SharePoint and WIKI.
From the results it can be seen that SharePoint is our recommended solution
The Comparisons have been completed on the Functional and Non-functional Requirements below:
If further details of the summary of score rankings are required, please find them below: