Plan
Document Sign-off
Name | Role | Date signed off |
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor | ||
Project Manager | ||
Programme Manager | ||
Priority and Funding
This has been initiated as a Priority 1 initiative. Funding is direct and from existing budgets for handling such projects.
Background
The purpose of this project is to prioritise and migrate the Windows 2003 and 2008 server estate to Windows Server 2016 to a supported level by the end of 2020. In addition, the project will monitor the holistic estate in order to be ready to start planning the Windows Server 2012 to 2016 (or another Microsoft upgrade if available) in two years time.
Scope
The items designated as in scope for this project are detailed below:
* Prioritised Windows 2003 and 2008 servers in the first two years
Document Approvals
Name | Project Role | Date |
---|---|---|
Graeme Wood | Project Sponsor (Head, ITI Enterprise Services) | 28/02/2017 |
Kirsty Waddell | ISG Project Manager | 28/02/2017 |
Murray Dippie |
Governance
Project will all have these governance roles by default.
Role | Name | Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor | Graeme Wood |
Enterprise Services Manager |
Priority and Funding
This is a Priority 1 Director initiative with a Programme Prioritisation rating of 12. Funding is direct – Estates are holding a fund of £200K on behalf of the IT Infrastructure Division of ISG that was previously secured from the College of Science and Engineering. An additional £50K through a small capital grant project from Estates has also been identified.
Further funding of £250K is being requested from the Campus Sustainability Fund.
Background
The purpose of this project is to increase the resilience and efficiency of the datacentres at both the James Clerk Maxwell building at the King’s Buildings and the one in Appleton Tower, which is in the central area of the University. The plan is to improve both datacentres to a Tier 2 Uptime Institute Performance Standard, or as a minimum to improve operational resilience to an acceptable level which is similar to Tier 2.
Approval Record
Check List Item |
Quality Criteria |
Complete Y/N |
Reviewed By |
Category and Billing Arrangements |
|
|
|