ITI Project Brief - RSS208 Cloud Service
Document Sign-off
Name |
Role |
Date signed off |
Maurice Franceschi |
Programme Manager |
06/12/19 |
David Fergusson |
Service Owner/ Project Sponsor |
06/12/19 |
Peter Sanderson |
Project Manager |
06/12/19 |
Jan Winter |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Systems |
06/12/19 |
Mike Wallis |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Support |
06/12/19 |
Background
The University of Edinburgh introduced its OpenStack based research cloud infrastructure at the beginning of 2017.
In the first year of operation the service has been very successful in attracting usage, to the point of being forced to increase the overprovisioning on nodes to meet demand.
We are aware of continuing interest in increased capacity from schools in CSE and also in the potential to support alternative computing modes from those in EDDIE (ie. Providing windows clusters to support rendering for ECA, and the option to run Digital Scholarship hadoop scripts successfully migrated from UCL).
While we have sufficient staff resource to operate and maintain the infrastructure and we have been able to install components which would provide advanced features, due to resource constraints we are unable to test and certify additional features for production.
This Project is to improve and update the OpenStack work that was implemented in RSS051 and to enable best Service Support and Benefits for RSS Teams and the Users.
This project will:
- Provided Eleanor OpenStack Service 3rd Party Support for 1 year
Upgrade the Eleanor OpenStack Service - Platform and Software
Scope
The following Services are in scope of this project:
- Eleanor OpenStack
Any changes to Scope documented in this Project Brief will be via a Change Request, recorded on the Issue, Change and Decision Logs in the Projects RAIDD xls.
Out of Scope
The following Services are out of scope of this project:
All other RSS Systems/Services
Objectives and Deliverables and Success Criteria
The overarching objectives of this project are to (via the help of various 3rd parties):
- Implement an Eleanor OpenStack Support Contract
- Upgrade Eleanor Server VM to Centos 8
- Upgrade Eleanor OpenStack to an interim version (x2 of the x4 Upgrades required)
- Upgrade Eleanor OpenStack to the latest version (last x2 of the x4 Upgrades required)
All whilst providing the correct levels of support, training and technical documentation.
This will improve deploy-ability, maintenance, functionality, manageability and performance for the users.
The duration of the project is expected to be 10 months from the start of the Financial Year and not the Approval and Sign Off of the Project Brief.
Unless otherwise indicated, the objectives and deliverables are a success when accepted by the Project Sponsor and the Service Owner as listed in the Requirements Success Criteria.
Objective |
Description of the Objective |
Success Criteria |
|
Description of the Deliverables needed to achieve the objective |
|
Objective 1 |
Implement a Support Process and Contract with StackHPC |
-Support Process and contract is agreed, in place and tested with StackHPC -All RSS personnel are fully conversant with the Support process and contract |
Objective 2 |
Upgrade OpenStack to Latest Version - 2 Upgrades Queens to Stein |
-Correctly functional OpenStack Service running on Stein |
Objective 3 |
Upgrade OpenStack to Latest Version - 1 Upgrade Stein-Train |
-Correctly functional OpenStack Service running on Train |
Objective 4 |
Upgrade OpenStack to Latest Version - 1 Upgrade Train-Ussuri |
-Correctly functional OpenStack Service running on Ussuri |
Objective 5 |
Deployment of OpenStack Monitoring Infrastructure (Infrastructure for logging, monitoring and alerting) |
-OpenStack Monitoring is produced correctly by the new infrastructure |
Objective 6 |
Deploy Ceilosca Optional Extension |
-Correct Ceilometer utilisation telemetry produced by Ceilosca |
Objective 7 |
Provide/Update New Service Documentation |
New Service Documentation is provided/updated: -Technical Guide -Technical Diagrams -User Guide |
Requirements
Requirements are what is required and aligned to deliver the project objectives and deliverables to ensure the benefits recorded are realised. These are documented in the RAIDD Log on the RTC TAB.
Requirements are set as MoSCoW:
MUST - we would see the project as failing totally or partially if these are not achieved
SHOULD - we have a high expectation that these will be doable with planned work and budget - but if necessary these can be de-scoped
COULD - if all goes very well, these might be possible
WON'T - we want to be explicit about certain things that people might expect us to deliver but we want to be clear we won't deliver
Benefits
The benefits to this project delivery are:
- Fully Supported OpenStack - Having a fully Supported OpenStack Service will assist in providing the best possible fault/issue resolution and Service
- Fully Supported OpenStack - Having a fully Supported OpenStack Service will help free up RSS Resources
- Latest version of OpenStack - Having an up to date OpenStack software deployment will provide the performance enhancements and feature benefits it brings with latest Supported Version - requires four upgrades
- New OpenStack Monitoring capability can be used once the Stien Version is implemented
- Cloud kitty can be implemented to enable better Accounting and Billing Functionality once the Stien Version is implemented
Governance
Portfolio Governance
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Programme Owner |
N/A |
N/A |
Programme Manager |
Maurice Franceschi |
IT Infrastructure Division / University of Edinburgh |
Portfolio Owner |
N/A |
N/A |
Portfolio Manager |
N/A |
N/A |
Service Owner |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Project Board
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Service Owner |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Project Manager |
Peter Sanderson |
Projects Services / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Systems |
Jan Winter |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems Team / Edinburgh University |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Support |
Mike Wallis |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Support Team / Edinburgh University |
Tolerances
The following are the tolerances for this project at which point the Project Manager must request approval of the change from the Sponsor and / or the Board via the Change Request process.
Escalating to programme/portfolio manager will be under direction from the Project Sponsor.
Tolerance |
Level |
+/- |
Remarks |
Budget |
£65,000 |
£6,500 |
No need for escalation if under |
Timeline |
10 Months |
4 Week |
No need for escalation if under |
Scope |
As Documented |
1 |
Any Change |
Quality / Success Criteria |
As Documented |
1 |
Any Change |
Resources Skills and Cost
Initial Resources are were based on a project start up estimate provided and approved at the start of the project:
- RSS Resource 10 Days
- IT PM 25 Days
- College/Schools 0 Days
- External Development 15 Days (TBC)
(Subject to change with further analysis and Planning)
- RSS Resources 17 Days
- IT PM 30 Days
- College/Schools 0 Days
- External Development 15 Days (TBC)
Budget
The total budget calculated for the Project is calculated in the table below with £30k Capital + £35k Revenue
Spending:
Internal |
Resource |
Required |
Expected |
Project Cost |
Remarks |
College / School resources |
- Various Stakeholders |
0 Days |
0 Days |
No Project Cost |
|
ITI Resources |
- David Fergusson - Jan Winter - Mike Wallis |
5 Days 10 Days 2 Days |
5 Days 10 Days 2 Days |
No Project Cost No Project Cost No Project Cost |
|
User Services |
- N/A |
0 Days |
0 Days |
No Project Cost |
|
Project Services |
- Peter Sanderson - Maurice Franceschi |
25 Days 5 Days |
25 Days 5 Days |
Capital Spend No Project Cost |
|
Totals |
|
47 Days |
17 Days (RSS) |
|
Only 10 initially allocated |
External
|
Resource |
Required |
Expected |
Project Cost |
Remarks |
StackHPC |
- Internal |
15 Days |
15 Days |
£ 40,788 (R) |
|
Totals |
|
15 Days |
15 Days |
£ 40,788 (R) |
£4,788 R over |
Priority and Funding
Priority - 3
UoE Funding Approved - £65,000 - (30k Capital + £35k Revenue)
UoE Funding Required - £65,000 - (20k Capital + £45k Revenue)
-change required to take into account the R overspend
Project Team
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Project Manager |
Peter Sanderson |
IT Infrastructure Division / Project Services / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Senior Business Supplier RSS Systems |
Jan Winter |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems / Edinburgh University |
Senior Business Supplier RSS Support |
Mike Wallis |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems / Edinburgh University |
Testing, Contributor |
N/A |
N/A |
StackHPC Resources |
John Taylor Stig Telfer Pierre Riteau William Szumski |
StackHPC |
Business Stakeholders
The Project Team consists of the following to be kept informed:
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
Informed |
David Perry |
CMVM - (IGMM) / Edinburgh University |
Informed |
Fraser Muir |
CAHSS / Edinburgh University |
Informed |
Victoria Dishon |
CSE / Edinburgh University |
Informed |
Sheila Fraser |
CMVM / Edinburgh University |
Preferred Supplier
The Preferred Suppliers are listed below:
Company |
Contact |
Expertise |
Remarks |
StackHPC |
John Taylor |
Managing Director/CEO |
|
StackHPC |
Stig Telfer |
Sales/Technical Manager |
|
StackHPC |
Pierre Riteau |
Technical Manager |
|
StackHPC |
William Szumski |
Technical Manager |
|
Quality of Project and Deliverables / Key Project Milestones
The milestones are a key tool in ensuring that the project process itself is followed as set out by ITI, and that the product deliverables are to the required Quality; the quality for the deliverables are to be confirmed by the respective Service Owner / SME as per the Requirements/Success Criteria table above.
Any changes to major milestones achievements and changes (Initiation, Planning, Delivery, and Closure) will be discussed with the Project Sponsor and Project Team and must be approved by Change Request by the Project Board and WIS as necessary.
The approach for this project outlined by the key milestones below. A more detailed plan will/has been produced, with the latest on the project SharePoint site:
RSS208 Project Plan_Cloud Service
Milestone |
Sign-Off means |
Date of Milestone |
Who signs-off (Accountability) |
1. Start Project/Project Brief |
-Initial resources and funding approved -Stakeholders Identified -GDPR Assessed Complete |
02/09/19 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
2. Project Documentation/Website/SharePoint Updating |
-Project Website Updated -Project SharePoint Site folder structure created and Updated -Project Outlook Folders created -Project RAIDD started and updated |
06/09/19 |
-Programme Manager -Project Manager |
3. Outline Requirements Sign Off |
-Initial Requirements confirmed, documented and agreed -Outline plan produced |
13/09/19 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
4. OpenStack Stakeholder and StackHPC Engagement |
-Vendors to engaged contacted and project deliverables explained -Vendors PO’s placed and integrated in the project with deliverables understood |
27/09/19 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
5. Project Planning & StackHPC Support Contract Complete |
- StackHPC Support Contract implemented and Complete -Outline plan confirmed -Resources Estimated -Resources Booked |
04/10/19 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
6. Project Brief produced and Signed Off |
-Project Brief Approved and Signed Off -Project Kicked Off with Project Team |
29/11/19 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
7. IS Alert and Go-CAB for Eleanor Upgrade Completed |
-IS Alert composed, agreed and issued 4 weeks prior -Implementation plan completed -Go-CAB CR paperwork composed, agreed and submitted to Go-CAB -Go-CAB attended and CR Approved |
05/11/19 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support -Vendor Senior Supplier |
8. RSS Systems Team prep Eleanor DEV |
-Eleanor DEV prepared and tested -Eleanor Dev handed over to Vender for development and testing |
07/11/19 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems |
9. StackHPC Development on Eleanor DEV |
-Eleanor DEV development completed by Vender |
22/11/19 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
10. StackHPC Test Eleanor DEV |
-Eleanor DEV Platform is implemented -Upgrade of software and VM components to latest versions available -Test that all software used works correctly -DEV Fully Tested working OK |
29/11/19 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
11. Eleanor Upgrade on PROD and Test |
-Eleanor PROD Platform is implemented -Upgrade of software and VM components to latest versions available -Test that all software used works correctly -PROD Fully Tested working OK |
06/12/19 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
12. Project Suspended |
-Project Suspended -No continuation of work until 2nd Upgrade is due
|
10/04/20 |
-Project Manager |
13. StackHPC Engagement for second set of Upgrades |
-Confirmation of 2nd Upgrade dates -Confirmation of 2nd Upgrade implementation plan |
17/04/20 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
14. IS Alert and Go-CAB for Eleanor 2nd Upgrade Completed |
-IS Alert composed, agreed and issued 4 weeks prior -Implementation plan completed -Go-CAB CR paperwork composed, agreed and submitted to Go-CAB -Go-CAB attended and CR Approved |
05/05/20 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support -Vendor Senior Supplier |
15. RSS Systems Team prep Eleanor DEV |
-Eleanor DEV prepared and tested -Eleanor Dev handed over to Vender for development and testing |
08/05/20 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems |
16. StackHPC Development on Eleanor DEV for 2nd Upgrade |
-Eleanor DEV development completed by Vender |
15/05/20 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
17. StackHPC Test Eleanor DEV for 2nd Upgrade |
-Eleanor DEV Platform is implemented -Upgrade of software and VM components to latest versions available -Test that all software used works correctly -DEV Fully Tested working OK |
22/05/20 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
18. Eleanor 2nd Upgrade on PROD and Test |
-Eleanor PROD Platform is implemented -Upgrade of software and VM components to latest versions available -Test that all software used works correctly -PROD Fully Tested working OK |
29/05/20 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Vendor Senior Supplier |
19. Delivery Complete |
-All Services components technically checked -All Technical Information Documented |
29/05/20 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
20. Acceptance |
-All Services components Accepted -Overall quality of deliverable is Accepted -Fit for delivery to live service for External Users -All Technical Information Documented Accepted -Any outstanding issues has an approved Owner, resolution and plan |
05/06/20 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
21. Close Project |
-All Objectives met -All Project documentation completed |
12/06/20 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager |
Assumptions
The Assumptions for this project are that:
- Any planned strike has no impact on Service Resources or SME
- Once the Requirements are documented and Project Brief are Approved and Signed Off, there will be no change of scope
- The Resources / SME required for the OpenStack Service will be made available to liaise with the developer when required, even with current/future commitments
- 3rd Party Supplier (StackHPC) will be able to provide suitably skilled Developers / Programmers
- 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) will be able to provide Developers / Programmers for the duration as required
Dependencies
The Dependencies for this project are:
- RSS Systems Team availability - The amount of time for Project work due to BAU work still to be carried out by the RSS System Team
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) will be able to provide suitably skilled SME
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) being able to provide SME for the duration as required
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) ability to deliver the required upgrade as planned by the correct check points/milestones
Constraints
The Constraints on this project are:
- RSS Systems Resource Time - The amount of time for Project work due to BAU work
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) will be able to provide suitably skilled Developers / Programmers
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) being able to provide Developers / Programmers for the duration as required
- Vendor Capability - 3rd Party Suppliers (StackHPC) ability to deliver the required development as planned by the correct check points/milestones
Previous Lessons Learned
The project manager will ensure that a Lessons Leaned Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting. The following are Lessons Learned from the ITI Projects SharePoint and team’s previous experience:
1. N/A
Risks
The project manager will ensure that a Risk Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting; ensuring project owners update their risks at least once a month or more as appropriate to the project.
The initial Risks highlighted are:
- Project Delay - Due to Strike Action, there may be a lack of resources
- Project Delay - Due to BAU or other project work, there may be a lack of resources
- Project Product - Due to BAU or other project work, the Resources have not been available to Complete or Approved the Project Brief
- Project Product - Due to Eleanor not being able to be upgraded
- Project Delay - Due to Eleanor Upgrade not being completed and delayed
Issues
The project manager will ensure that an Issue Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting.
The following are Lessons Learned from the ITI Projects SharePoint and team’s previous experience:
- N/A
Communication
The project manager will also ensure all changes to cost/timeline/scope are recorded in the issue log, and reflected in milestones log, budget and estimations, and the project Scope Change log.
Project Sites - There are two Project Management Sites for the project:
- Project Web Page: Project information for all to see, with the Logs being restricted by the project manager to the required project members:
- Project SharePoint Site: Project information repository for project members only, mainly used for storing documents to enable a single source for updating and completing:
Stakeholders - The project manager will produce a Stakeholder Map and complete a Stakeholder Engagement Grid; which will be agreed at the Kick-off meeting and reviewed and maintained during the project life cycle.
Communication Plan - The project manager will produce a Communications Plan for the project and ensure all parties understand the communications routes and timescales. This will also be agreed at the Kick-off meeting and cover the headings in this section.
Meetings - The Project Team Meeting Agenda template will be used to record all meetings and saved to the Project SharePoint Site:
- Project Board Update Meeting On request or issue
- Project Sponsor and Project Manager Meeting Weekly
- Project Team Meeting Weekly
Reporting -
- ITI Project Monthly Report Monthly
- Project Sites Weekly
- Project Logs Weekly
Escalations - Project Escalations will be directed to the Project Manager, who will document the escalation as a Risk/Issue then escalate via the appropriate Governance level:
- Escalate area SME
- Project Team
- Project Board – Project Sponsor
- Programme Board – Programme Manager
- University
Run / Grow / Transform
This project is to help transform and improve the Eleanor Service and Support for RSS Systems Team and all Users.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alignment with Strategic Vision
Guidance (please remove)
This project will deliver benefits, change and innovations in alignment with the IS Strategic Vision and the University's Strategic Vision for 2025. ** Check the Annual Plan on ITI Sharepoint to see how the project's deliverables and benefits have been aligned to Run/Grow/Transform and the Strategic Themes **
IS Strategic Vision the main elements of the vision that this projects contibutes to are highlighted in bold.
Student Experience |
Commentary |
Student experience and the unique Edinburgh offer | |
Online and distance learning leaders | |
Library national and international leadership | |
Research and Innovation |
|
Research IT and Data Sciences | |
Innovation | |
Collaborative leadership and social responsibility | |
Service Excellence |
|
Process improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice | |
Long‐term IS strategic planning and linked professional services | |
Information Security |
University's Strategic Vision for 2025 the main elements of the vision that this projects contributes to are highlighted in bold.
Vision Themes | Commentary |
A unique Edinburgh offer for all of our students | |
• all of our undergraduates developed as student/ researchers with clear, supported pathways through to Masters and PhD | |
• all our students offered the opportunity to draw from deep expertise outside their core discipline | |
• a highly satisfied student body with a strong sense of community. | |
Strong and vibrant communities within and beyond the University – making the most of our unique offer of world-leading thinking and learning within one of the world’s most attractive cities | |
A larger, more international,staff who feel valued and supported in a University that is a great and collegial place to work, develop and progress | |
More postgraduate students – underpinned by the best support in the sector to ensure we attract the brightest and best regardless of ability to pay | |
A strong culture of philanthropic support focussed especially on our students and on outstanding research capabilities. | |
Many more students benefiting from the Edinburgh experience (largely or entirely) in their own country – supported by deep international partnerships and world- leading online distance learning | |
Sustained world leading reputation for the breadth, depth and interdisciplinarity of our research supported by strong growth in research funding and strong international partnerships – drawing from well-established and less well developed sources |
|
An estate that matches expectations, responds flexibly to changing student and staff needs, and showcases the University |
|
A deeper and earlier collaboration with industry, the public sector and the third sector – in terms of research; knowledge exchange; and in giving our students the best possible set of skills for their future |
|
Digital Transformation | Commentary |
---|---|
Describe how the changes this project delivers will contribute to the digitial transformation of the Service |
IS Change Programme - How will this project's Deliverables and Benefits promote the Themes
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if the project deliverables and benefits contribute to the themes with the IS Change Programme.
IS Change Programme Theme | How the project deliverables and benefits contribute to change |
Project Management | |
Working Together | |
Standards and Technical Leadership | |
Staff Learning and Development | |
Service Based Culture | |
Equality and Diversity | |
Partnerships and Philanthropy | |
Flexible Resourcing | |
Communication and Branding |
Service Excellence - Information and Security
Guidance (please remove)
Are we using standard builds for the project (that is, pre-validated security controls will be in place for infrastructure and data)? Or Do we anticipate having to develop non-standard infrastructure?
Will we have third party integrations on installations?
Are we dealing with data outwith our standard set of controls?
If so, What level of risk is associated with the data? What are the appropriate controls?
The project must outline how it is dealing with risk, how the need to design/build/test impacts on project scope, budget and timeline.
Confirm which University or divisional polices are providing guidance here.
Set Security design, execution and acceptance as a Deliverable Quality Assurance
Create a Security Milestone for Delivery - and Design, Build and Acceptance depending on project complexity - that must be signed-off by Project Manager and Section Head.
Create any specific risks around security
Service Excellence - Process Improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice (Social Responsibility and and Sustainability)
Guidance (please remove)
If the project could or will lead to recycling of hardware then Create a milestone called 'Recycle - Engagement' so that the project can engage with the Department for Social Responsibility and Sustainability at the appropriate time
Add a Benefit to the ITI Benefits Management and Realisation log (ITI Projects Sharepoint)
Is there an opportunity to take advantage of the Green IT Initiative for further funding?
Otherwise set as Not Applicable.
Digital Transformation
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if and how the project itself is contributing to Digital Transformation.
WiIl it use available resources or funding specific to the initiative? e.g. using the services of the ISG Usability Team, applying for Digital Transformation funding.
Are we using new techniques or tools or processes in this project that can be used to transform how we work in general?
IS Change Programme - How will the execution of this project promote the Themes
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if the project itself (during plan, execution, implementation) contributes to the themes with the IS Change Programme.
Some expectations and suggestions from ISG Directors - what to think about for each them when planning the project some_expectations_and_suggestions_from_isg_directors.pdf
IS Change Programme Theme | How the project process will contribute to change |
Project Management | |
Working Together |
Guidance (please remove)Will the project team talk to other colleagues across IS? Can they bring previous experience and fresh thinking to the project? Add working together to your Communication Plan - go beyond the stakeholders. How will you raise awareness of the project with your colleagues across the divisions? Might you work closer - co-locate, for example? Could the processes involved in the project itself be improved - what is difficult to do? Is the Admin cumbersome, time-consuming? Add to the Closure Report. Look to guidance from the IS Change Management team on how to approach this.
|
Standards and Technical Leadership | |
Staff Learning and Development |
Guidance (please remove)Is there an opportunity for the project to offer development opportunities for colleagues? Could someone from another team in our division or another ISG division be seconded to the project to provide skills we may be struggling to find in this period? Can we offer a development opportunity for someone in our division at a lower grade - to come into our project and be skilled up, fulfil a higher grade role for a while? For planning, make sure you allow the necessary time to engage / recruit in your project, and feed back to the annual plan/forward look?
|
Service Based Culture |
Guidance (please remove)Are we helping the service to shift-left? For services impacted by the change we are delivering : check the Service Catalogue (due for 2016/17) for Service Owner and Service Operations Manager. Confirm with them who should be stakeholders on the project. Also check with head of IS Helpline. Confirm at what stages if the project SO/SOM want representation and sign-off - especially around Design and UAT and Delivery. Do we need a Handover? Add Stakeholders to these Milestones. Is there a CMDB entry to update to reflect changes?
|
Equality and Diversity |
Guidance (please remove)Planning: Discuss the Project Board, project team and key stakeholders with your Sponsor - do the groupings reflect/promote diversity? Be aware of particular periods or dates that may conflict with religious or social or domestic obligations. Design: Are we designing a User Interface? Are we designing with best practice in Usability and Accessibility for all devices? Please explicitly ensure that the Design of the UI has been checked for promotion of Equality and Diversity. e.g. Use 'Mx' in the Honorifics section- - but do we even need honorifics - how much information do we actually need to collect from a user? Does our interface make assumptions about the kinds of people our users are? Do we accommodate people who are at a distance, working flexibly, may not wish to be identified by gender, race, age or show a photo? Do we give options as to what services users might want or do we assume they will want what we want, or what users have wanted in the past? Are we being creative in thinking about use cases beyond the metrics and other ‘evidence' we have for users in the past - not simply recreating/perpetuating old ways of working? How are we naming a Service (or even Hardware) ? Consider a naming convention to highlight or promote Equality and Diversity. Do we have the opportunity in this to promote role models or show our understanding of diversity? Would this give us an additional route for comms or stakeholder engagement? e.g UCL named their HPC ‘Grace’ https://www.ucl.ac.uk/isd/news/isd-news/research-it/introducing-grace which gave them an added ‘good news story’ and a chance to dispel myths that there are no women in computing. Quality Assurance: Add a Design Milestone and a separate Milestone for Acceptance Sign-Off. The Design Milestone confirms that the UI has been checked for promotion of Equality and Diversity, and that we have designed an inclusive UI. Add to the Design Milestone, or better, create a separate Usability Milestone for Design and QA. There must be a separate EqIA Milestone to show that this has been done. Ensure that appropriate authority is signing off on the legal aspects of Equality and Diversity.
|
Partnerships and Philanthropy |
Guidance (please remove)Does/can/might this project promote or leverage partnerships? Are there any philanthropic aspects around the execution of this project - are we providing free resources or software, for example?
|
Flexible Resourcing |
Guidance (please remove)Have we considered contract staff, students and interims (and in future, apprentices)? Can a difficult resourcing situation be resolved by use of fixed term staff or limited secondments? For planning, make sure you allow the necessary time to engage / recruit in your project, and feed back to the annual plan/forward look.
|
Communication and Branding |
Guidance (please remove)Communication: Ensure that you have a session as part of planning for Stakeholder identification and analysis. Set out the communication plan by the end of the project brief - or set a milestone date for when you will have this in place if end of planning not possible. Project Manager is the accountable person and will sign-off the milestone.
Branding: Are you delivering a new Service or significantly upgrading a new service? If so, then the project team must engage with the new Branding guidelines and Change Management Theme team for ISG, the branding for the school or college via the college marketing team, the University's Comms and Marketing team - potentially all of these. Use gel.ed.ac.uk to access assets and guidelines for branding of communications, websites, mobiles. Use the Student Digital Guidelines.
Quality Assurance: A milestone must be created for Branding and the Project Manager must sign-off as the accountable person.
|
Project Sponsor – Project Responsibilities
The sign-off milestones are associated with specific responsibilities of the Sponsor role .
Guidance (please remove)
This sets out the Sponsor responsibilities on this project - please review and amend as appropriate for this project and agree with Sponsor
Start of project – Explicitly Included in the Initiation Milestones Sign-Off
- Negotiates and confirms funding for the project
- Ensures the project is in line with organisational strategy and priorities
- Chairs the project board, appoints its members and ensures they are effective
- Advises the project manager of protocols, political risks, issues and sensitivities
- Makes the project visible within the organisation
End of Planning – Explicitly Included in the Planning Milestone Sign-Off
- Works with the project manager to develop the Project Brief
- Ensures a realistic project plan is produced
- Sets tolerance levels for escalation to themselves and to the project board
- Ensures that project team have representation and engagement from users and suppliers
- Helps identify Stakeholders
- Approves Communication Plan
- Agrees on frequency of meetings with Project Manager
- Agrees of frequency of meetings with Project Team
- Agrees on milestones and who signs-off
Execution – ongoing
- Provides strategic direction and guidance to the project manager as directed by the Board
- Approves changes to plans, priorities, deliverables, schedule
- Encourages stakeholder involvement and maintains their ongoing commitment
- Chief risk taker
- Makes go/no-go decisions
- Communicates change in organisational structure, priorities, business benefits or funding
- Helps the project manager in conflict resolution
- Helps resolve inter project boundary issues
- Gains agreement among stakeholders when differences of opinion occur
- Assists the project by exerting organisational authority and the ability to influence
Delivery – Explicitly Included in the Delivery Sign-Off
- Ensures that Service is ready for change
Closure - Explicitly Included in the Closure Milestone Sign-Off
- Helps with publicity for the change delivered
- Ensure that benefits will be managed, measured and realised post-project
- Evaluates the project’s success upon completion
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 341.89 KB |
![]() | 35.44 KB |