ITI Project Brief - RSS203 New Core Services Impact
Document Sign-off
|
Name |
Role |
Date signed off |
|
Maurice Franceschi |
Programme Manager |
06/12/19 |
|
David Fergusson |
Service Owner/ Project Sponsor |
06/12/19 |
|
Peter Sanderson |
Project Manager |
06/12/19 |
|
Jan WInter |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Systems |
06/12/19 |
|
Mike Wallis |
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Support |
06/12/19 |
Background
The University has a Project currently running to change its Core Services Platforms for HR and Finance.
This Project is to conduct a review and provide recommendations and solutions to the impact of those changes to Research Service's Services and Systems to ensure minimum disruption or impact to the Researchers and Users.
RSS consumes a number of outputs of the Core Services for managing critical aspects of user interaction with RSS Services.
For instance User access to EDDIE and DataStore and allocations are determined automatically by consuming the HR status of individuals on entry to or leaving the university.
The gamut of RSS Services are therefore critically impacted by changes to Core Services.
RSS therefore needs to be able to react to changes brought about by the planned changes to Core Services.
This project will:
- Provide a Full Impact Report on RSS Operations for the proposed implementation of the new Core Services
- Provide Recommendation and Future Actions that can be implemented to reduce or mitigate the impact to Users during the new Core Services implementation
- Provide a Plan, in conjunction with the new Core Services Project and Implementation Plan that could be implemented to mitigate any circumstances required
Provide Reassurance for the User that demonstrates disruption to Users will be nil or minimal during the new Core Services
Scope
The following Services are in scope of this project:
- All Research Services
Any changes to Scope documented in this Project Brief will be via a Change Request, recorded on the Issue, Change and Decision Logs in the Projects RAIDD xls.
Out of Scope
The following Services are out of scope of this project:
- N/A
Objectives and Deliverables and Success Criteria
The overarching objectives of this project are to (via the help of various 3rd parties):
- Carry out a New Core Services Impact on RSS Systems and Processes Review and documenti them in a Report
- Provide Recommendations and Future Actions that can be implemented to reduce or mitigate the impact to Users during the new Core Services implementation
- Provide an RSS Plan, in conjunction with the new Core Services Project and Implementation plan that could be implemented to mitigate any circumstances required
- Provide the means to Reassure Users that demonstrates disruption to Users will be nil or minimal during the new Core Services implementation
All whilst providing the correct levels of support, training and technical documentation.
This will improve deploy-ability, maintenance, functionality, manageability and performance for the users.
The duration of the project is expected to be 1 month from the start of the Project, not the Financial Year or from the Approval and Sign Off of the Project Brief. This may increase if the New Core Services Project Team and information is unavailable.
Unless otherwise indicated, the objectives and deliverables are a success when accepted by the Project Sponsor and the Service Owner as listed in the Requirements Success Criteria.
|
Objective |
Description of the Objective |
Success Criteria |
|
Objective 1 |
A Full Impact Report on RSS Operations for the proposed implementation of the new Core Services |
A Full Impact Report on RSS Operations for the proposed implementation of the new Core Services |
|
Objective 2 |
Recommendations and Future Actions that can be implemented to reduce or mitigate the impact to Users during the new Core Services implementation |
Recommendations and Future Actions are provided that can be implemented to reduce or mitigate the impact to Users during the new Core Services implementation |
|
Objective 3 |
A plan, in conjunction with the new Core Services project and implementation plan that could be implemented to mitigate any circumstances required |
An RSS plan that could be implemented to mitigating any circumstances required in conjunction with the new Core Services project and implementation plan |
|
Objective 4 |
Reassurance for the User that demonstrates disruption to Users will be nil or minimal during the new Core Services implementation |
Reassurance is provided that disruption to Users will be nil or minimal during the new Core Services implementation |
Requirements
Requirements are what is required and aligned to deliver the project objectives and deliverables to ensure the benefits recorded are realised. These are documented in the RAIDD Log on the RTC TAB.
Requirements are set as MoSCoW:
MUST - we would see the project as failing totally or partially if these are not achieved
SHOULD - we have a high expectation that these will be doable with planned work and budget - but if necessary these can be de-scoped
COULD - if all goes very well, these might be possible
WON'T - we want to be explicit about certain things that people might expect us to deliver but we want to be clear we won't deliver
Benefits
The benefits to this project delivery are:
- Investigation into the New Core Services will provide Research Services with a clear idea of what the new Core Services are and how they will impact RSS operation.
- Investigation into the New Core Services will provide Research Services with recommendations and future actions required to reduce or mitigate any impact from the implementation of the new Core Services.
- Investigation into the New Core Services will provide Research Services with a clear idea of the new Core Services implementation plan and project timescales and how and when they will impact RSS operation.
- Provide reassurance to Researchers that any impact reduced disruption to Researchers during the migration to new core systems.
Governance
Portfolio Governance
|
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
|
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Programme Owner |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Programme Manager |
Maurice Franceschi |
IT Infrastructure Division / University of Edinburgh |
|
Portfolio Owner |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Portfolio Manager |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Service Owner |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
Project Board
|
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
|
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Service Owner |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Project Manager |
Peter Sanderson |
Projects Services / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Systems |
New team Lead TBC |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems Team / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Systems |
Jan Winter |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems Team / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier - RSS Support |
Mike Wallis |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Support Team / Edinburgh University |
Tolerances
The following are the tolerances for this project at which point the Project Manager must request approval of the change from the Sponsor and / or the Board via the Change Request process.
Escalating to programme/portfolio manager will be under direction from the Project Sponsor.
|
Tolerance |
Level |
+/- |
Remarks |
|
Budget |
£20,000 |
£2,000 |
No need for escalation if under |
|
Timeline |
1 Month |
3 Days |
No need for escalation if under |
|
Scope |
As Documented |
1 |
Any Change |
|
Quality / Success Criteria |
As Documented |
1 |
Any Change |
Resources Skills and Cost
Initial Resources are were based on a project start up estimate provided and approved at the start of the project:
- RSS Resource 26 Days
- IT PM 29 Days
- College/Schools 0 Days
- External Development 0 Days (TBC)
(Subject to change with further analysis and Planning)
- RSS Resources 34 Days
- IT PM 32 Days
- College/Schools 0 Days
- External Development 3 Days (TBC)
Budget
The total budget calculated for the Project is calculated in the table below with £20k Capital + £60k Revenue
Spending:
|
Internal |
Resource |
Required |
Expected |
Project Cost |
Remarks |
|
College / School Resources |
- Various Stakeholders |
0 Days |
0 Days |
No Project Cost |
|
|
ITI Resources |
- David Fergusson - Jan Winter - System Team Lead - Mike Wallis |
5 Days 12 Days 14 Days 3 Days |
5 Days 12 Days 14 Days 12 Days |
No Project Cost No Project Cost No Project Cost No Project Cost |
|
|
User Services |
- New Core Services Project Team |
3 Days |
3 Days |
No Project Cost |
|
|
Project Services |
- Peter Sanderson - Maurice Franceschi |
29 Days 3 Days |
29 Days 3 Days |
Capital Spend No Project Cost |
|
|
Totals |
|
69 Days |
34 Days (RSS) |
|
Approved |
|
External
|
Resource |
Required |
Expected |
Project Cost |
Remarks |
|
N/A |
N/A |
0 Days |
0 Days |
£0,000 (R) |
Initial + TBC |
|
Totals |
|
0 Days |
0 Days |
£0,000 (R) |
|
Priority and Funding
Priority - 1
UoE Funding Approved - £20,000 - (0k Capital + £20k Revenue)
UoE Funding Required - £20,000 - (0k Capital + £20k Revenue)
Project Team
|
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
|
Project Sponsor |
David Fergusson |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Project Manager |
Peter Sanderson |
IT Infrastructure Division / Project Services / RSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier RSS Systems |
New team Lead TBC |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier RSS Systems |
Jan Winter |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems / Edinburgh University |
|
Senior Business Supplier RSS Support |
Mike Wallis |
IT Infrastructure Division / RSS / Systems / Edinburgh University |
|
Testing, Contributor |
N/A |
N/A |
|
New Core Services Project Team |
Michael McMonagle Dave Berry |
IT Infrastructure Division / Development Services / Edinburgh University |
Business Stakeholders
The Project Team consists of the following to be informed at key points (if required):
|
Role |
Name |
Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
|
Informed |
David Perry |
CMVM - (IGMM) / Edinburgh University |
|
Informed |
Fraser Muir |
CAHSS / Edinburgh University |
|
Informed |
Victoria Dishon |
CSE / Edinburgh University |
|
Informed |
Sheila Fraser |
CMVM / Edinburgh University |
Preferred Supplier
The Preferred Suppliers are listed below:
|
Company |
Contact |
Expertise |
Remarks |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Quality of Project and Deliverables / Key Project Milestones
The milestones are a key tool in ensuring that the project process itself is followed as set out by ITI, and that the product deliverables are to the required Quality; the quality for the deliverables are to be confirmed by the respective Service Owner / SME as per the Requirements/Success Criteria table above.
Any changes to major milestones achievements and changes (Initiation, Planning, Delivery, and Closure) will be discussed with the Project Sponsor and Project Team and must be approved by Change Request by the Project Board and WIS as necessary.
The approach for this project outlined by the key milestones below. A more detailed plan will/has been produced, with the latest on the project SharePoint site:
RSS203 Project Plan_New Core Services Impact
|
Milestone |
Sign-Off means |
Date of Milestone |
Who signs-off (Accountability) |
|
1. Start Project/Project Brief |
-Initial resources and funding approved -Stakeholders Identified -GDPR Assessed Complete |
02/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
2. Project Documentation/Website/SharePoint Updating |
-Project Website Updated -Project SharePoint Site folder structure created and Updated -Project Outlook Folders created -Project RAIDD started and updated |
02/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Manager |
|
3. Outline Requirements Sign Off |
-Initial Requirements confirmed, documented and agreed -Outline plan produced |
06/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
4. New Core Services Stakeholder Engagement |
-Project Stakeholders to engaged contacted and project deliverables explained |
05/12/2019 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems |
|
5. Project Planning |
-Outline plan confirmed -Resources Estimated -Resources Booked |
06/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
6. Project Brief produced and Signed Off |
-Project Brief Approved and Signed Off -Project Kicked Off with Project Team |
11/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
7. Produce New Core Service Impact ppt |
-Covert all information provided by the New Core Services Team to usable information for the RSS Teams |
06/12/2019 |
-Project Manager |
|
8. New Core Services Impact Review Period |
-Information Reviewed and Impacts Recorded / Investigated |
13/12/2019 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
9. New Core Services Impact Review Results Meeting |
-All Teams provide Impacts found and possible solutions and how and when to implement if required - |
16/12/2019 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
10. Produce New Core Services Impact Report |
- Complete Report -Recommendations -Actions to carry out if required -Plan to implement if required -Communication to RSS and Colleges |
18/12/2019 |
-Project Manager Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
11. New Core Services Impact Report Approval |
- New Core Services Impact Report is Agreed and Approved by RSS Teams and Management |
20/12/2019 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
12. Delivery Complete |
-All Services components technically checked -All Technical Information Documented |
20/12/2019 |
-Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
13. Acceptance |
-All Services components Accepted -Overall quality of deliverable is Accepted -Fit for delivery to live service for External Users -All Technical Information Documented Accepted -Any outstanding issues has an approved Owner, resolution and plan |
20/12/2019 |
-Project Sponsor -Project Manager -Senior Business Supplier Systems -Senior Business Supplier Support |
|
14. Close Project |
-All Objectives met -All Project documentation completed |
23/12/2019 |
-Programme Manager -Project Sponsor -Project Manager |
Assumptions
The Assumptions for this project are that:
- The only current Core Services change expected to affect RSS is the weekly HR xls dump/new API
- Core Services Project will add RSS Dependency to the Project RAIDD and add it to the Requirements of the Project
- The RSS Dependency and Requirement will be/have been included in the Core Services Project
- Core Services Project Information will made available to the RSS203 Project Manager/RSS Teams
- Core Services Project Architecture will made available to the RSS203 Project Manager/RSS Teams
- Core Services Project plan and timescales will made available to the RSS203 Project Manager/RSS Teams
Dependencies
The Dependencies for this project are:
- The availability of the New Core Services PM
- The availability of the New Core Services Information
- The availability of the New Core Services Architecture
- The availability of the New Core Services implementation Plan
- For the New Core Services Project, the RSS Requirements
Constraints
The Constraints on this project are:
- The availability of the New Core Services PM
- The availability of the New Core Services Information
- The availability of the New Core Services Architecture
- The availability of the New Core Services implementation Plan
Previous Lessons Learned
The project manager will ensure that a Lessons Leaned Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting. The following are Lessons Learned from the ITI Projects SharePoint and team’s previous experience:
- N/A
Risks
The project manager will ensure that a Risk Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting; ensuring project owners update their risks at least once a month or more as appropriate to the project.
The initial Risks highlighted are:
- Project Delay - Due to Strike Action, there may be a lack of resources
- Project Delay - Due to BAU or other project work, there may be a lack of resources
- Project Delay - Due to not being able to secure the New Core Services Project Team Time/Resource
- Project Delivery - Due to New Core Services Information, Architecture and Implementation Plan not being available
- Project Product - Due to BAU or other project work, the Resources have not been available to Complete or Approved the Project Brief
Issues
The project manager will ensure that an Issue Log is created, maintained and reviewed by the project team at every team meeting. The following are Lessons Learned from the ITI Projects SharePoint and team’s previous experience:
- N/A
Communication
The project manager will also ensure all changes to cost/timeline/scope are recorded in the issue log, and reflected in milestones log, budget and estimations, and the project Scope Change log.
Project Sites - There are two Project Management Sites for the project:
- Project Web Page: Project information for all to see, with the Logs being restricted by the project manager to the required project members:
New Core Services Impact Website
- Project SharePoint Site: Project information repository for project members only, mainly used for storing documents to enable a single source for updating and completing:
New Core Services Impact SharePoint
Stakeholders - The project manager will produce a Stakeholder Map and complete a Stakeholder Engagement Grid; which will be agreed at the Kick-off meeting and reviewed and maintained during the project life cycle.
Communication Plan - The project manager will produce a Communications Plan for the project and ensure all parties understand the communications routes and timescales. This will also be agreed at the Kick-off meeting and cover the headings in this section.
Meetings - The Project Team Meeting Agenda template will be used to record all meetings and saved to the Project SharePoint Site:
- Project Board Update Meeting On request or issue
- Project Sponsor and Project Manager Meeting Weekly
- Project Team Meeting Weekly
Reporting -
- ITI Project Monthly Report Monthly
- Project Sites Weekly
- Project Logs Weekly
Escalations - Project Escalations will be directed to the Project Manager, who will document the escalation as a Risk/Issue then escalate via the appropriate Governance level:
- Escalate area SME
- Project Team
- Project Board – Project Sponsor
- Programme Board – Programme Manager
- University
Run / Grow / Transform
This project is to help Transform and improve the Services and Support for RSS Systems Team and all Users.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alignment with Strategic Vision
Guidance (please remove)
This project will deliver benefits, change and innovations in alignment with the IS Strategic Vision and the University's Strategic Vision for 2025. ** Check the Annual Plan on ITI Sharepoint to see how the project's deliverables and benefits have been aligned to Run/Grow/Transform and the Strategic Themes **
IS Strategic Vision the main elements of the vision that this projects contibutes to are highlighted in bold.
|
Student Experience |
Commentary |
| Student experience and the unique Edinburgh offer | |
| Online and distance learning leaders | |
| Library national and international leadership | |
|
Research and Innovation |
|
| Research IT and Data Sciences | |
| Innovation | |
| Collaborative leadership and social responsibility | |
|
Service Excellence |
|
| Process improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice | |
| Long‐term IS strategic planning and linked professional services | |
| Information Security |
University's Strategic Vision for 2025 the main elements of the vision that this projects contributes to are highlighted in bold.
| Vision Themes | Commentary |
| A unique Edinburgh offer for all of our students | |
| • all of our undergraduates developed as student/ researchers with clear, supported pathways through to Masters and PhD | |
| • all our students offered the opportunity to draw from deep expertise outside their core discipline | |
| • a highly satisfied student body with a strong sense of community. | |
| Strong and vibrant communities within and beyond the University – making the most of our unique offer of world-leading thinking and learning within one of the world’s most attractive cities | |
| A larger, more international,staff who feel valued and supported in a University that is a great and collegial place to work, develop and progress | |
| More postgraduate students – underpinned by the best support in the sector to ensure we attract the brightest and best regardless of ability to pay | |
| A strong culture of philanthropic support focussed especially on our students and on outstanding research capabilities. | |
| Many more students benefiting from the Edinburgh experience (largely or entirely) in their own country – supported by deep international partnerships and world- leading online distance learning | |
| Sustained world leading reputation for the breadth, depth and interdisciplinarity of our research supported by strong growth in research funding and strong international partnerships – drawing from well-established and less well developed sources |
|
| An estate that matches expectations, responds flexibly to changing student and staff needs, and showcases the University |
|
|
A deeper and earlier collaboration with industry, the public sector and the third sector – in terms of research; knowledge exchange; and in giving our students the best possible set of skills for their future |
|
| Digital Transformation | Commentary |
|---|---|
| Describe how the changes this project delivers will contribute to the digitial transformation of the Service |
IS Change Programme - How will this project's Deliverables and Benefits promote the Themes
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if the project deliverables and benefits contribute to the themes with the IS Change Programme.
| IS Change Programme Theme | How the project deliverables and benefits contribute to change |
| Project Management | |
| Working Together | |
| Standards and Technical Leadership | |
| Staff Learning and Development | |
| Service Based Culture | |
| Equality and Diversity | |
| Partnerships and Philanthropy | |
| Flexible Resourcing | |
| Communication and Branding |
Service Excellence - Information and Security
Guidance (please remove)
Are we using standard builds for the project (that is, pre-validated security controls will be in place for infrastructure and data)? Or Do we anticipate having to develop non-standard infrastructure?
Will we have third party integrations on installations?
Are we dealing with data outwith our standard set of controls?
If so, What level of risk is associated with the data? What are the appropriate controls?
The project must outline how it is dealing with risk, how the need to design/build/test impacts on project scope, budget and timeline.
Confirm which University or divisional polices are providing guidance here.
Set Security design, execution and acceptance as a Deliverable Quality Assurance
Create a Security Milestone for Delivery - and Design, Build and Acceptance depending on project complexity - that must be signed-off by Project Manager and Section Head.
Create any specific risks around security
Service Excellence - Process Improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice (Social Responsibility and and Sustainability)
Guidance (please remove)
If the project could or will lead to recycling of hardware then Create a milestone called 'Recycle - Engagement' so that the project can engage with the Department for Social Responsibility and Sustainability at the appropriate time
Add a Benefit to the ITI Benefits Management and Realisation log (ITI Projects Sharepoint)
Is there an opportunity to take advantage of the Green IT Initiative for further funding?
Otherwise set as Not Applicable.
Digital Transformation
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if and how the project itself is contributing to Digital Transformation.
WiIl it use available resources or funding specific to the initiative? e.g. using the services of the ISG Usability Team, applying for Digital Transformation funding.
Are we using new techniques or tools or processes in this project that can be used to transform how we work in general?
IS Change Programme - How will the execution of this project promote the Themes
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if the project itself (during plan, execution, implementation) contributes to the themes with the IS Change Programme.
Some expectations and suggestions from ISG Directors - what to think about for each them when planning the project
some_expectations_and_suggestions_from_isg_directors.pdf
| IS Change Programme Theme | How the project process will contribute to change |
| Project Management | |
| Working Together |
Guidance (please remove)Will the project team talk to other colleagues across IS? Can they bring previous experience and fresh thinking to the project? Add working together to your Communication Plan - go beyond the stakeholders. How will you raise awareness of the project with your colleagues across the divisions? Might you work closer - co-locate, for example? Could the processes involved in the project itself be improved - what is difficult to do? Is the Admin cumbersome, time-consuming? Add to the Closure Report. Look to guidance from the IS Change Management team on how to approach this.
|
| Standards and Technical Leadership | |
| Staff Learning and Development |
Guidance (please remove)Is there an opportunity for the project to offer development opportunities for colleagues? Could someone from another team in our division or another ISG division be seconded to the project to provide skills we may be struggling to find in this period? Can we offer a development opportunity for someone in our division at a lower grade - to come into our project and be skilled up, fulfil a higher grade role for a while? For planning, make sure you allow the necessary time to engage / recruit in your project, and feed back to the annual plan/forward look?
|
| Service Based Culture |
Guidance (please remove)Are we helping the service to shift-left? For services impacted by the change we are delivering : check the Service Catalogue (due for 2016/17) for Service Owner and Service Operations Manager. Confirm with them who should be stakeholders on the project. Also check with head of IS Helpline. Confirm at what stages if the project SO/SOM want representation and sign-off - especially around Design and UAT and Delivery. Do we need a Handover? Add Stakeholders to these Milestones. Is there a CMDB entry to update to reflect changes?
|
| Equality and Diversity |
Guidance (please remove)Planning: Discuss the Project Board, project team and key stakeholders with your Sponsor - do the groupings reflect/promote diversity? Be aware of particular periods or dates that may conflict with religious or social or domestic obligations. Design: Are we designing a User Interface? Are we designing with best practice in Usability and Accessibility for all devices? Please explicitly ensure that the Design of the UI has been checked for promotion of Equality and Diversity. e.g. Use 'Mx' in the Honorifics section- - but do we even need honorifics - how much information do we actually need to collect from a user? Does our interface make assumptions about the kinds of people our users are? Do we accommodate people who are at a distance, working flexibly, may not wish to be identified by gender, race, age or show a photo? Do we give options as to what services users might want or do we assume they will want what we want, or what users have wanted in the past? Are we being creative in thinking about use cases beyond the metrics and other ‘evidence' we have for users in the past - not simply recreating/perpetuating old ways of working? How are we naming a Service (or even Hardware) ? Consider a naming convention to highlight or promote Equality and Diversity. Do we have the opportunity in this to promote role models or show our understanding of diversity? Would this give us an additional route for comms or stakeholder engagement? e.g UCL named their HPC ‘Grace’ https://www.ucl.ac.uk/isd/news/isd-news/research-it/introducing-grace which gave them an added ‘good news story’ and a chance to dispel myths that there are no women in computing. Quality Assurance: Add a Design Milestone and a separate Milestone for Acceptance Sign-Off. The Design Milestone confirms that the UI has been checked for promotion of Equality and Diversity, and that we have designed an inclusive UI. Add to the Design Milestone, or better, create a separate Usability Milestone for Design and QA. There must be a separate EqIA Milestone to show that this has been done. Ensure that appropriate authority is signing off on the legal aspects of Equality and Diversity.
|
| Partnerships and Philanthropy |
Guidance (please remove)Does/can/might this project promote or leverage partnerships? Are there any philanthropic aspects around the execution of this project - are we providing free resources or software, for example?
|
| Flexible Resourcing |
Guidance (please remove)Have we considered contract staff, students and interims (and in future, apprentices)? Can a difficult resourcing situation be resolved by use of fixed term staff or limited secondments? For planning, make sure you allow the necessary time to engage / recruit in your project, and feed back to the annual plan/forward look.
|
| Communication and Branding |
Guidance (please remove)Communication: Ensure that you have a session as part of planning for Stakeholder identification and analysis. Set out the communication plan by the end of the project brief - or set a milestone date for when you will have this in place if end of planning not possible. Project Manager is the accountable person and will sign-off the milestone.
Branding: Are you delivering a new Service or significantly upgrading a new service? If so, then the project team must engage with the new Branding guidelines and Change Management Theme team for ISG, the branding for the school or college via the college marketing team, the University's Comms and Marketing team - potentially all of these. Use gel.ed.ac.uk to access assets and guidelines for branding of communications, websites, mobiles. Use the Student Digital Guidelines.
Quality Assurance: A milestone must be created for Branding and the Project Manager must sign-off as the accountable person.
|
Project Sponsor – Project Responsibilities
The sign-off milestones are associated with specific responsibilities of the Sponsor role .
Guidance (please remove)
This sets out the Sponsor responsibilities on this project - please review and amend as appropriate for this project and agree with Sponsor
Start of project – Explicitly Included in the Initiation Milestones Sign-Off
- Negotiates and confirms funding for the project
- Ensures the project is in line with organisational strategy and priorities
- Chairs the project board, appoints its members and ensures they are effective
- Advises the project manager of protocols, political risks, issues and sensitivities
- Makes the project visible within the organisation
End of Planning – Explicitly Included in the Planning Milestone Sign-Off
- Works with the project manager to develop the Project Brief
- Ensures a realistic project plan is produced
- Sets tolerance levels for escalation to themselves and to the project board
- Ensures that project team have representation and engagement from users and suppliers
- Helps identify Stakeholders
- Approves Communication Plan
- Agrees on frequency of meetings with Project Manager
- Agrees of frequency of meetings with Project Team
- Agrees on milestones and who signs-off
Execution – ongoing
- Provides strategic direction and guidance to the project manager as directed by the Board
- Approves changes to plans, priorities, deliverables, schedule
- Encourages stakeholder involvement and maintains their ongoing commitment
- Chief risk taker
- Makes go/no-go decisions
- Communicates change in organisational structure, priorities, business benefits or funding
- Helps the project manager in conflict resolution
- Helps resolve inter project boundary issues
- Gains agreement among stakeholders when differences of opinion occur
- Assists the project by exerting organisational authority and the ability to influence
Delivery – Explicitly Included in the Delivery Sign-Off
- Ensures that Service is ready for change
Closure - Explicitly Included in the Closure Milestone Sign-Off
- Helps with publicity for the change delivered
- Ensure that benefits will be managed, measured and realised post-project
- Evaluates the project’s success upon completion
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 341.89 KB | |
| 35.44 KB |
