Organisation
Work/Task Breakdown
Gap analysis between current processes and Practique | Who is involved |
Exam Fit analysis session for Admissions | Completed |
Exam Fit report for Admissions | Fry (Supplier) |
Exam Fit analysis session for Vets | Completed |
Exam Fit report for Vets | Fry (Supplier) |
Exam Fit analysis session for BMTO | Completed |
Exam Fit report for BMTO | Fry (Supplier) |
Implement new instances | |
Delivery of Admissions Instance | Fry (Supplier) |
Delivery of Vets/BMTO Instance |
Fry (Supplier) |
Training Day each for Admissions, Vets and BMTO | Required: School staff/Fry (Supplier); TBC: Project Manager/IT lead |
Creation of content for Admissions, Vets and BMTO in Practique | School staff/Fry (Supplier) |
SSO to be implemented for new instances (as per current) | Project Manager/ITI/IT Lead |
Pilot for Admissions | School staff/Fry (Supplier) |
Pilot for Vets | School staff/Fry (Supplier) |
Support calls with supplier for Admissions, Vets and BMTO following respective training days to go Live | School staff/Fry (Supplier) |
Build of ipads for Admissions and Vets | IT Lead/Vets Computing support |
Delivery using Practique | |
Admissions Assessment Days for MBChB | School staff/Fry (Supplier)/IT Lead |
OSCEs for Vets | School staff/Fry (Supplier)/IT Lead |
Written Exams for BMTO | School staff/Fry (Supplier)/IT Lead |
Resources, Skills and Costs
Funding for PM time is coming from Core Funded Ring-Fenced days. The College is responsible for supplier costs.
College resources
Each of the participating areas in the College have completed an Exam Fit session with the Supplier and have agreed and already scheduled the key dates to ensure resources are available. In agreeing the timeline, all schools agreed that they would be able to accommodate the work required in the work breakdown outlined above.
IT staff - IT lead and the Vets computing staff will be key in ensuring that ipads being used will be available and correctly configured
Project Services resources
The Project Management required now that the plan has been established will be to deal with any issues which arise and to continue the relationship with the supplier
Supplier
The supplier has scheduled and agreed to the key dates. The roles which the project directly interacts with are the Supplier's UoE account manager, the implementation lead and the technical expert enabling SSO
Project Governance
This project will follow the standard project governance in Project Services.
Any changes to major milestones (Initiation, Planning, Delivery, Closure) will be approved by the Project Sponsor, Project Team and WIS.
Major milestones achievements and changes will be submitted to WIS for approval/noting as necessary.
Project Stakeholders
Name | Business Area | Role |
---|---|---|
Alan Gilchrist | ISG | MVM Learning and Teaching IT Lead |
Assessors and administrative staff in schools | MVM | Exam creators, assessors, administrators supporting leads |
Eoghan Clarkson | MVM | Vets Computing support |
Hannah Pietruszewska | Fry (software supplier) | Supplier Implementation lead |
Ilaria Marchi | MVM | MBChB Admissions Business Lead |
ITI Enterprise team | ISG | Single sign-on with supplier |
Jen Hill | MBChB | Current lead user of Practique |
Lindsay Dalziel | MVM | Vets Business Lead |
Lorna Marson | MVM | Project Sponsor and Admissions Senior User |
Philip Larkman | MVM | BMTO Sernior User |
Sheila Fraser | ISG | Head of IT, MVM |
Students in participating schools | MVM | Not direct users of Practique but will be impacted by change of eg feedback format |
Susan Rhind | CMVM | Vets Senior User |
Susan Ridder-Patrick | ISG | Project and Programme Manager |
Tina Harvey | MVM | BMTO Business Lead |
Trisha Higginson | Fry (software supplier) | Account manager |
Project Estimations
mvm136_3point_estimate_at_brief.xls
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 51.5 KB |