CIS010 Project Brief v 3.0
Document Sign-off
Name | Role | Date signed off |
---|---|---|
Tony Weir |
Director, ITI |
10/3/2017 |
Alastair Reid | Director, H&S | 10/3/2017 |
Karen Darling | Deputy Director, H&S | 10/3/2017 |
Grant Ferguson | Head of Estates Operations and Assistant Director, Estates | 10/3/2017 |
Claire Barnish | Director, ACE | 10/3/2017 |
David Graham |
CIS Section Head ITI |
10/3/2017 |
Maurice Francesch |
Project Manager, ITI |
10/3/2017 |
feedback from Project Team | version 2.0 | |
feedback from Gavin McLachlan and Dave Graham | version 2.1 | |
approved brief | version 3.0 |
Background
Recent power outages at King’s Buildings and a number of recent network faults have highlighted the risk of a communication failure resulting in the inability to contact Security or emergency services in the event of an emergency when using the new University Voice over IP (VoIP) telephone system.
The University has a statutory duty to ensure that “any necessary contacts with external services are arranged, particularly as regards first aid, emergency medical care and rescue work.” This duty requires a phone line that continues to work in the event of a telephony or network system failure or power outage.
Many buildings have a requirement for a back-up telephone which can survive loss of power or data network or telephony and which can be used to contact external services.
The University also has approximately 170 lifts which must should have a means to summon assistance if someone becomes trapped and a two way means of communication with a lift rescue service designed and constructed so as to function without the normal power supply.
Scope
To provide back-up phones which can provide an alternative means of communication in the event of local power outages, or failures of University telephone service or University data network.
To install gateway devices over main campuses to provide the necessary resilience. These gateways allow a telephone to fail over from the new VoIP service to an external line, should the VoIP service fail in any way (e.g. power failure and/or telephone system or data network failure). These gateways would be located within central communications points within campuses and would be protected from power failures. Each gateway can support 80 emergency telephones. To ensure appropriate cabling to connect the emergency phone back to the gateway, and in some locations it may be more cost effective to install a standalone external line to the emergency phone, rather than use the gateway solution.
Appropriate Signage
Ensuring that documentation is changed where it refers to processes relevant to emergency procedures
A phased implementation of this solution, with King’s Buildings emergency phones being implemented first.
Changes to Scope will be logged on the Issue Log.
Lift and Emergency Phones Profile
Lift Phones
- must be able to remain operative for at least 3 hours after loss of power to building, to lift (i.e. not local lift power supply) and data network
- can call out to Security or - where defined - an external emergency number / lift company must receive calls from Security
- from scope (for Security) for this project are 'Car' lift phones i.e. standard passenger lifts (TBC)
- lifts in buildings owned by the University
- lifts in buildings owned by ACE
- two way communication
Emergency Phones
- must be able to remain operative for at least 3 hours after loss of power to building, to lift (including any backup power the lift itself is provisioned with) and data network
- the number(s) that the phone can call to be designated on a case-by-case basis
- security and internal and external call can be received
- 'devices' as well as phones are to be resilient e.g. devices at emergency evacuation points : this needs clarified and confirmed by board
- major incident room(s) will have an emergency phone (possibly more than one if required)
- security team locations will have an emergency phone
- provide an emergency backup phone to Major Incident Team (to be clarified)
- Emergency Phones can be used as normal phones outwith emergencies
- Emergency Phones will be distinguishable from other phones - coloured red for example
- where University/ACE does not own the building or have primary responsibility for Emergency procedures, arrangements for contacting emergency services in the event of a power/network failure should be clarified with the building owner/manager and so may be within project scope
- these phones will be known as 'Emergency Phones' - this does not mean they are the ONLY phones to be used in an emergency, but are phones that must be operable in an emergency. This will be part of the communications to communities. (Alternative names could be used such as 'Backup Phones' if the project board so decided).
Out of Scope
- evacuation lifts
- non-passenger Lift phones are out of scope - stair lift phones, animal lifts
- Lift and Emergency phones in buildings not owned by the university (e.g. Argyle House)
- in exceptional circumstances where there is a suitable compliant, recorded and understood working solution already in place and the cost of cabling is seen as not justified
- the update of DEEP GEEP and PEEP's profiles for emergency scenarios
- It is not in scope of this project to migrate other systems in the university to the new resilient infrastructure - but the project does acknowledge that this is a long-term objective (i.e. all emergency systems on the one infrastructure) and will seek to make this happen wherever possible. e.g. Refuge Phones may be a system that could migrate.) This project will try and test out a Refuge Phone scenario so that project can be informed and make its own decision for future direction.
Objectives and Deliverables and Success Criteria
Description of the Objective |
||
Description of the Deliverables needed to achieve the objective | Success Criteria | |
Objective 1 |
Pilot the solution at King's Buildings by end of October 2017 | |
Deliverable D1.1 | Lift phones in selected buildings are operable after loss of power to building and lifts and UoE phone network also down |
Lift phones must survive the loss of power and of the data and phone network. Lift phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested during power/networks loss. |
Deliverable D1.2 |
Any emergency phones that have been installed in selected buildings are operable after loss of power to building and UoE phone network also down | Emergency phones must survive the loss of power and of the data and phone network. Emergency phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested during power/networks loss. |
Deliverable D1.3 | A re-estimate of the effort and cost and timeline for roll-out of proven solution to rest of the university | Project Board approval for plan and costs |
Deliverable D1.4 | Identify all lift phones to be upgraded across the estate | H&S agree on the lifts to be upgraded Estates agree on the lifts to be upgraded |
Deliverable D1.5 | Identify all buildings which are to have an emergency phone | H&S agree on the building to have / not to have an emergency phone and if there is to be more than one phone provides |
Objective 2 |
Deploy the solution to whole university estate : Date to be confirmed after pilot | |
Deliverable D2.1 | All lift phones are operable after loss of power to building and lifts and UoE phone network also down | Lifts can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested |
Deliverable D2.2 | All emergency phones that have been installed are operable after loss of power to building or UoE phone or data network failure | Emergency phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested |
Deliverable D2.3 | Delivery of emergency phones to security teams at the University and ACE | Emergency phones can call out and receive calls |
Deliverable D2.4 | Delivery of emergency phones to major incident teams and rooms at the University and ACE | Emergency phones can call out and receive calls |
Objective 3 |
Inform other Projects and Local Emergency Processes | |
Deliverable D3.1 |
Clear communication to other projects dealing with emergency provision so they change as required | Other projects are aware of the changes being implemented |
Deliverable D3.2 | Clear communication to stakeholders dealing with established emergency proedures so they change as required | Existing processes are aware of the changes being implemented |
Objective 4 |
Facilitate the migration of all emergency systems in the university to single solution | |
Deliverable D4.1 | Explore the options with the Refuge Team to trial (Central Area location, such as Teviot Row House) | Show that a single solution for all systems is achievable |
Objective 5 |
Ensure that deployed Lifts and Phones have appropriate levels of maintenance and checking | |
Deliverable D5.1 | Confirm with stakeholders - assist to formulate as necessary - the ongoing process for checking and maintenance of lift phones | Visible and auditable processes to maintain and check lift phones |
Deliverable D5.2 | Confirm with stakeholders - assist to formulate as necessary - the ongoing process for checking and maintenance of emergency phones | Visible and auditable processes to maintain and check emergency phones |
Deliverable D5.3 | Use this project to set a as-is assessment of Lift phones | An audit of the usability, condition, ownership of Lift Phones |
This table can be used through Business and Technical Analysis, Design, Build, and Testing/UAT as a Traceability Matrix to ensure the project brief project objectives and deliverables are followed through.
Requirements
Requirement | User / Owner | MoSCoW | Associated Objective/Deliverable (Ox/Dx.x) |
All lifts phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure | Estates / IS | Must | O1/D1.1 and O2/D2.1 |
All emergency phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure | Estates / IS | Must | O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2 |
All security team phones (UoE and ACE) are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure | Terry Gillan | Must | O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2 |
The major incident room(s) phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure | Terry Gillan | Must | O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2 |
Clear Communication Plan and Execution thereof so all stakeholders are aware of the changes | Maurice Franceschi | Must | O3/D3.1 and O3/D3.2 |
Refuge Phones are moved to the new resilient infrastructure | Estates / Andy Mackay | Could | O4/D4.1 |
Updated or New process to ensure that lift and emergency phones are maintained and checked | Estates | Must | O5/D5.1 and O5/D5.2 |
Benefits
Benefits management and realisation will be available on the ITI Sharepoint space.
By delivering the technical solution to provide full resilience to emergency and lift phones, the benefits to the University are of improved safety to staff, students and visitors should an emergency situation develop.
Governance
Project Board
The proposed project board - for approval by Project Sponsor
Role | Name | Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
---|---|---|
Senior Owner | Tony Weir | Director ITI |
Senior User |
Alastair Reid Karen Darling |
Director H&S Deputy Director H&S |
Senior Supplier | Dave Graham | CIS Section Head, ITI |
Other board members | ||
Grant Ferguson | Head of Estates Operations and Assistant Director, Estates | |
Michelle Christian | Assistant Director (Property & Residential Services), ACE | |
Charles Hill | Project and Planning Manager, CSG | |
Tolerances
The Project Board will be immediately informed and asked for approval if
- the estimation for project budget increases by 10% or more ,
- delivery milestones slip by a month or more,
- if there is a change in scope
Resources Skills and Cost
Budget
£300K TBC
Priority and Funding
This is a highest category priority project for ISG. Priority 1.
Funding TBC by Estates and ISG.
Project Team
The installation of lines and phones will be carried out by the ISG CIS team members or commissioned contractors. The Health and Safety Management Team in Estates must be consulted about installation planes especially any work which is intrusive and may have implications for the management of Asbestos.
The rest of the project team have the main task of helping with the communications from the project team to the community and stakeholders - in particular with messages to and meetings with building managers, local H&S and Fire and Security officers, and Heads of School or equivalent. This will include establishing 'golden copy' lists of buildings, lift phones and identified stakeholders.
The proposed project team - for approval by Project Sponsor
Role | Name | Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title |
---|---|---|
Project Manager | Maurice Franceschi | ITI, ITI Portfolio Manager |
Technical Lead and other technicians | Dave Graham | ITI, Section Head CIS |
Ian Christie | ITI, Service Manager | |
Alan Rae | ITI, Service Manager | |
Business Lead(s) | Andy Mackay | University Fire Safety Adviser, Health and Safety |
Sheila Scott | Building Services Manager, Building Services | |
Karen Darling | H&S, Deputy Director | |
Joe Brannigan | Health and Safety Advisor, Estates | |
Terry Gillan | Security Shift Manager, Security | |
Procurement Advisor | not required as framework for purchasing gateways in place | |
User(s) - who will help in analysis, testing and sign-offs | Building Managers Local H&S Local Fire Local Securty | |
Quality of Project and Deliverables / Key Project Milestones
User Acceptance Testing plans will be drawn up by the project team to confirm the various scenarios where power, phone network and data network may fail. In addition to the total loss of power or network, the UAT will include partial failures of phone and data network to see if the lift and emergency phones provide the resilience as anticipated.
Health and Safety are the Senior User and their sign-off of UAT is essential.
Outline plan
Pilot Phase
Main Task | Estimated Date | Actioned By |
Approval of Project Brief, Planning, Communications | 15/9/2017 | Maurice Franceschi, Board |
Delivery of Gateway and Implementation by Supplier | TBC | Dave Graham, Getronics |
Internal testing by CIS of Lift and Emergency Phone configuration | October | CIS |
Engagement with stakeholders for selected building to pilot : emails, website/sharepoint and meetings | October | Project Team / Board |
Development and sign-off of UAT Plan | October | Project Team, Stakeholders, Board |
Pilot : power outage, phone network failure and data network failure in selected buildings | November | CIS, Stakeholders |
Review of outcomes : recommendation, estimates and plans to the Project Board for deployment across the Estate based on Pilot outcomes : decision on approach to take | November/Dec | Maurice Franceschi, Board |
The project team proposes that we pilot these buildings for emergency and lift phones.
Building Name and number |
School |
Head of School |
Health and Safety Manager/Relevant Contact
|
Joseph Black Building/0632 |
Chemistry |
Professor Colin Pulham |
Phil McDonaldTechnical Services Manager Isobel Easedale, H&S Advisor |
Arcadia Nursery/0678 |
ACE |
Richard Kingston |
The Manager : Karen Gilhooly TBC |
JCMB/0613 |
Multi-Occupancy |
|
MOBUG Convener : Will Hossack |
Alexander Graham Bell/0618 |
Engineering? |
Professor Hugh McCann |
Bryan Mitchell (with building team on copy) |
Ashworth Labs/0640 |
Multi-Occupancy |
|
MOBUG Convener : David Brown |
Grant Institute/Geology/Geophysics/0633 |
Geo-Sciences |
Professor Simon Kelley |
Graham Walker |
The CIS team will default to providing an emergency phone at the reception area for a building - to be confirmed by a survey - or upgrading existing emergency phones.
Communication to the local stakeholders (Head of School, Building Owner, H&S, Fire, Security) will propose provision of emergency phones. The project team will arrange a meeting with representatives from the selected buildings.
Part of this communication is to make it clear that Laboratory phones are not Emergency phones and should be upgraded to Standard VOIP handset.
We will trial this communication approach at KB Pilot and if successful would intend to continue in this way for full deployment across the estate.
The Project Team will provide Golden Copy information on all lifts and building profile.
The Project Board will provide approve the buildings which are to have one (or more) Emergency Phones in or none.
There are two approaches once Pilot has proven successful and we can estimate time and effort and cost- the project team will ask the project board to select the option to be chosen after the pilot is completed successfully.
Deployment to the Estate - Option 1
Only upgrade the Lift Phones - pilot at KB then whole Estate Once competed, start on Emergency phones
Deployment to the Estate - Option 2
Upgrade the Lift Phones and Emergency Phones
Milestone | Sign-Off means | Date of Milestone | Who signs-off (Accountability) |
Start of Project |
Project can begin, is in line with Programme and Portfolio priority, has resource |
10/7/2017 |
Sponsor, Programme Manager |
End of Planning |
Project Brief, Plan, Estimated Budget, Risks, Communication Plan - all approved. Project has resource approved by section head for the estimated effort. Project has funding for effort for other costs. |
31/8/2017 |
Sponsor, PM, Programme Manager, Section Head(s) |
KB Pilot | |||
End of Analysis for the Pilot | quality and completeness of analysis for what is needed for the pilot at KB | business analyst / business lead / senior user / PM | |
End of Design for the Pilot | quality and completeness of technical design for lift and emergency phones cabled to the new gateway providing resilience | technical lead / senior supplier/ business lead / senior user/ PM | |
End of Build for the Pilot | quality and completeness of build - lift and emergency phones are in place and ready for user acceptance testing | technical lead / senior supplier/ PM | |
Communication to Stakeholders | Written and Meeting with key stakeholders for the selected buildings for the Pilot | ||
Acceptance |
Lift Phones survive 3 hours and can make and receive calls to designated numbers (several scenarios)Emergency Phones survive 3 hours and can make and receive calls to designated numbers (several scenarios) |
|
CIS and Estates Representatives |
Deployment to UoE/ACE | TBC | ||
Decide Approach | Project Board | ||
Replanning and Estimates | |||
Assumptions
The Key Assumption being made is the Profile of an Emergency Phone and Profile of a Lift Phone (as above). This drives the requirements.
We assume our information on buildings and lifts is up to date.
We are making the assumption that around 250 buildings will require one emergency phone.
Constraints
There are no known constraints on the project
Risks
Due to the sensitivity of the information, this project will share its documentation, risks and issues on Sharepoint. The current risks are listed in the CIS010 Project Logs. The project website will only be used for high level milestones and project brief and high level project progress reports.
Issues
Due to the sensitivity of the information, this project will share its documentation, risks and issues on Sharepoint.
Previous Lessons Learned
Important that what is Out of Scope is understood and agreed at the project start - project board has this responsibility.
From the CIS001 VOIP replacement project, we know that meeting are much more effective in clarity and engagement than any email communication, even from senior management.
Dependencies
No dependencies on other project.
CIS001 VOIP replacement is dependant on this project to allow it to decommission analogue telephony network and to replace Laboratory and other 'emergency' phone handsets with VOIP.
Version Control
Project Documentation will adopt the following convention
- Documentation in development will be version 0.x or 1.x
- Documentation submitted for Approval will be version 2.x
- Documentation signed-off as complete will be version 3.0
- And changes to the document will be change managed and result in version 3.x
Communication
The communication for the project will be a key element in its success.
The outline may be summarised as Stakeholder : -
Project Team to help with initial communication to the Head of School/equivalent to set up meeting with key stakeholders of buildings effected to explain what is to be done and importantly, not in scope Project Board to deal with escalations from stakeholders
Project Board :- monthly report from project manager project board meetings : after pilot to KB is complete and then every four months during full deployment TBC) escalations when tolerances breached or critical risks and issues are raised
The Communication Plan will be on Sharepoint and set out the comms for the project - as planned and as executed.
Run / Grow / Transform
This a Grow project
Alignment with Strategic Vision
Guidance (please remove)
This project will deliver benefits, change and innovations in alignment with the IS Strategic Vision and the University's Strategic Vision for 2025. ** Check the Annual Plan on ITI Sharepoint to see how the project's deliverables and benefits have been aligned to Run/Grow/Transform and the Strategic Themes **
IS Strategic Vision the main elements of the vision that this projects contibutes to are highlighted in bold.
Student Experience |
Commentary |
Student experience and the unique Edinburgh offer | x |
Online and distance learning leaders | |
Library national and international leadership | |
Research and Innovation |
|
Research IT and Data Sciences | |
Innovation | |
Collaborative leadership and social responsibility | |
Service Excellence |
|
Process improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice | x |
Long‐term IS strategic planning and linked professional services | |
Information Security |
University's Strategic Vision for 2025 the main elements of the vision that this projects contributes to are highlighted in bold.
Vision Themes | Commentary |
A unique Edinburgh offer for all of our students | |
• all of our undergraduates developed as student/ researchers with clear, supported pathways through to Masters and PhD | |
• all our students offered the opportunity to draw from deep expertise outside their core discipline | |
• a highly satisfied student body with a strong sense of community. | |
Strong and vibrant communities within and beyond the University – making the most of our unique offer of world-leading thinking and learning within one of the world’s most attractive cities | |
A larger, more international,staff who feel valued and supported in a University that is a great and collegial place to work, develop and progress | |
More postgraduate students – underpinned by the best support in the sector to ensure we attract the brightest and best regardless of ability to pay | |
A strong culture of philanthropic support focussed especially on our students and on outstanding research capabilities. | |
Many more students benefiting from the Edinburgh experience (largely or entirely) in their own country – supported by deep international partnerships and world- leading online distance learning | |
Sustained world leading reputation for the breadth, depth and interdisciplinarity of our research supported by strong growth in research funding and strong international partnerships – drawing from well-established and less well developed sources |
|
An estate that matches expectations, responds flexibly to changing student and staff needs, and showcases the University |
x |
A deeper and earlier collaboration with industry, the public sector and the third sector – in terms of research; knowledge exchange; and in giving our students the best possible set of skills for their future |
|
Digital Transformation | Commentary |
---|---|
Describe how the changes this project delivers will contribute to the digitial transformation of the Service | n/a |
IS Change Programme - How will this project's Deliverables and Benefits promote the Themes
Guidance (please remove)
Indicate if the project deliverables and benefits contribute to the themes with the IS Change Programme.
IS Change Programme Theme | How the project deliverables and benefits contribute to change |
Project Management | |
Working Together | |
Standards and Technical Leadership | |
Staff Learning and Development | |
Service Based Culture | X |
Equality and Diversity | X |
Partnerships and Philanthropy | |
Flexible Resourcing | |
Communication and Branding |
Service Excellence - Information and Security
n/a
Service Excellence - Process Improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice (Social Responsibility and and Sustainability)
n/a
Digital Transformation
n/a
IS Change Programme - How will the execution of this project promote the Themes
IS Change Programme Theme | How the project process will contribute to change |
Project Management | |
Working Together |
The project involves many colleagues in ISG, Estates, Corporate and Colleges working together
|
Standards and Technical Leadership | |
Staff Learning and Development |
|
Service Based Culture |
|
Equality and Diversity |
|
Partnerships and Philanthropy |
|
Flexible Resourcing |
The project has been helped by the use of students to conduct a survey of the estate's lifts
|
Communication and Branding |
communication in the project should improve cross-divisional understanding
|
Project Sponsor – Project Responsibilities
The sign-off milestones are associated with specific responsibilities of the Sponsor role .
Start of project – Explicitly Included in the Initiation Milestones Sign-Off
- Negotiates and confirms funding for the project
- Ensures the project is in line with organisational strategy and priorities
- Chairs the project board, appoints its members and ensures they are effective
- Advises the project manager of protocols, political risks, issues and sensitivities
- Makes the project visible within the organisation
End of Planning – Explicitly Included in the Planning Milestone Sign-Off
- Works with the project manager to develop the Project Brief
- Ensures a realistic project plan is produced
- Sets tolerance levels for escalation to themselves and to the project board
- Ensures that project team have representation and engagement from users and suppliers
- Helps identify Stakeholders
- Approves Communication Plan
- Agrees on frequency of meetings with Project Manager
- Agrees of frequency of meetings with Project Team
- Agrees on milestones and who signs-off
Execution – ongoing
- Provides strategic direction and guidance to the project manager as directed by the Board
- Approves changes to plans, priorities, deliverables, schedule
- Encourages stakeholder involvement and maintains their ongoing commitment
- Chief risk taker
- Makes go/no-go decisions
- Communicates change in organisational structure, priorities, business benefits or funding
- Helps the project manager in conflict resolution
- Helps resolve inter project boundary issues
- Gains agreement among stakeholders when differences of opinion occur
- Assists the project by exerting organisational authority and the ability to influence
Delivery – Explicitly Included in the Delivery Sign-Off
- Ensures that Service is ready for change
Closure - Explicitly Included in the Closure Milestone Sign-Off
- Helps with publicity for the change delivered
- Ensure that benefits will be managed, measured and realised post-project
- Evaluates the project’s success upon completion