CIS010 Project Brief v 3.0

Document Sign-off

Name Role Date signed off
Tony Weir

Director, ITI

10/3/2017
Alastair Reid Director, H&S 10/3/2017
Karen Darling Deputy Director, H&S 10/3/2017
Grant Ferguson Head of Estates Operations and Assistant Director, Estates 10/3/2017
Claire Barnish Director, ACE 10/3/2017

David Graham

CIS Section Head ITI

10/3/2017
Maurice Francesch

Project Manager, ITI

10/3/2017
     
  feedback from Project Team version 2.0
  feedback from Gavin McLachlan and Dave Graham version 2.1
  approved brief version 3.0

 

 

Background

Recent power outages at King’s Buildings and a number of recent network faults have highlighted the risk of a communication failure resulting in the inability to contact Security or emergency services in the event of an emergency when using the new University Voice over IP (VoIP) telephone system.

The University has a statutory duty to ensure that “any necessary contacts with external services are arranged, particularly as regards first aid, emergency medical care and rescue work.” This duty requires a  phone line that continues to work in the event of a telephony or network system failure or power outage.

Many buildings  have a requirement for a back-up telephone which can survive loss of power or data network or telephony and which can be used to contact external services.

The University also has approximately 170 lifts which must should have a means to summon assistance if someone becomes trapped and a two way means of communication with a lift rescue service designed and constructed so as to function without the normal power supply.

Scope

To provide back-up phones which can provide an alternative means of communication in the event of local power outages, or failures of University telephone service or University data network.  

To install gateway devices over main campuses to provide the necessary resilience.  These gateways allow a telephone to fail over from the new VoIP service to an external line, should the VoIP service fail in any way (e.g. power failure and/or telephone system or data network failure).   These gateways would be located within central communications points within campuses and would be protected from power failures.  Each gateway can support 80 emergency telephones. To ensure appropriate cabling to connect the emergency phone back to the gateway, and in some locations it may be more cost effective to install a standalone external line to the emergency phone, rather than use the gateway solution.

Appropriate Signage

Ensuring that documentation is changed where it refers to processes relevant to emergency procedures

A phased implementation of this solution, with King’s Buildings emergency phones being implemented first.

Changes to Scope will be logged on the Issue Log.  

Lift and Emergency Phones Profile

 

Lift Phones

  • must be able to remain operative for at least 3 hours after loss of power to building, to lift (i.e. not local lift power supply) and data network
  • can call out to Security or - where defined - an external emergency number / lift company must receive calls from Security
  • from scope (for Security) for this project are 'Car' lift phones i.e. standard passenger lifts (TBC)
  • lifts in buildings owned by the University  
  • lifts in buildings owned by ACE
  • two way communication   

Emergency Phones

  • must be able to remain operative for at least 3 hours after loss of power to building, to lift (including any backup power the lift itself is provisioned with) and data network
  • the number(s) that the phone can call to be designated on a case-by-case basis
  • security and internal and external call can be received
  • 'devices' as well as phones are to be resilient e.g. devices at emergency evacuation points : this needs clarified and confirmed by board
  • major incident room(s) will have an emergency phone (possibly more than one if required)
  • security team locations will have an emergency phone
  • provide an emergency backup phone to Major Incident Team (to be clarified)
  • Emergency Phones can be used as normal phones outwith emergencies
  • Emergency Phones will be distinguishable from other phones - coloured red for example
  • where University/ACE does not own the building or  have primary responsibility for Emergency procedures, arrangements for contacting emergency services in the event of a power/network failure should be clarified with the building owner/manager and so may be within project scope
  • these phones will be known as 'Emergency Phones'  - this does not mean they are the ONLY phones to be used in an emergency, but are phones that must be operable in an emergency. This will be part of the communications to communities. (Alternative names could be used such as 'Backup Phones' if the project board so decided).

 

Out of Scope

  • evacuation lifts
  • non-passenger Lift phones are out of scope - stair lift phones, animal lifts
  • Lift and Emergency phones in buildings not owned by the university (e.g. Argyle House)
  • in exceptional circumstances where there is a suitable compliant, recorded and understood working solution already in place and the cost of cabling is seen as not justified
  • the update of DEEP GEEP and PEEP's profiles for emergency scenarios

 

  • It is not in scope of this project to migrate other systems in the university to the new resilient infrastructure - but the project does acknowledge that this is a long-term objective (i.e. all emergency systems on the one infrastructure) and will seek to make this happen wherever possible. e.g. Refuge Phones may be a system that could migrate.) This project will try and test out a Refuge Phone scenario so that project can be informed and make its own decision for future direction.

 

 

Objectives and Deliverables and Success Criteria  

  Description of the Objective  
  Description of the Deliverables needed to achieve the objective Success Criteria
Objective 1 Pilot the solution at King's Buildings by end of October 2017  
   Deliverable D1.1 Lift phones in selected buildings are operable after loss of power to building and lifts and  UoE phone network also down

Lift phones must survive the loss of power and of the  data and phone network.  

Lift phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested  during power/networks loss.

   Deliverable D1.2

Any emergency phones that have been installed in selected buildings are operable after loss of power to building and UoE phone network also down Emergency phones must survive the loss of power and of the  data and phone network. Emergency phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested during power/networks loss.
   Deliverable D1.3 A re-estimate of the effort and cost and timeline for roll-out of proven solution to rest of the university Project Board approval for plan and costs
   Deliverable D1.4 Identify all lift phones to be upgraded across the estate H&S agree on the lifts to be upgraded Estates agree on the lifts to be upgraded
   Deliverable D1.5 Identify all buildings which are to have an emergency phone H&S agree on the building to have / not to have an emergency phone and if there is to be more than one phone provides
Objective 2 Deploy the solution to whole university estate : Date to be confirmed after pilot  
   Deliverable D2.1 All lift phones are operable after loss of power to building and lifts and  UoE phone network also down Lifts can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested
   Deliverable D2.2 All emergency phones that have been installed are operable after loss of power to building or UoE phone or data network failure Emergency phones can call out and receive calls from Security /External - Tested
   Deliverable D2.3 Delivery of emergency phones to security teams at the University and ACE Emergency phones can call out and receive calls
  Deliverable D2.4 Delivery of emergency phones to major incident teams and rooms at the University and ACE Emergency phones can call out and receive calls
Objective 3 Inform other Projects and Local Emergency Processes  

   Deliverable D3.1

Clear communication to other projects dealing with emergency provision so they change as required Other projects are aware of the changes being implemented
   Deliverable D3.2 Clear communication to stakeholders dealing with established emergency proedures so they change as required Existing processes are aware of the changes being implemented
Objective 4 Facilitate the migration of all emergency systems in the university to single solution  
   Deliverable D4.1 Explore the options with the Refuge Team to trial (Central Area location, such as Teviot Row House) Show that a single solution for all systems is achievable
Objective 5 Ensure that deployed Lifts and Phones have appropriate levels of maintenance and checking  
   Deliverable D5.1 Confirm with stakeholders - assist to formulate as necessary - the ongoing process for checking and maintenance of lift phones Visible and auditable processes to maintain and check lift phones
   Deliverable D5.2 Confirm with stakeholders - assist to formulate as necessary - the ongoing process for checking and maintenance of emergency phones Visible and auditable processes to maintain and check emergency phones
   Deliverable D5.3 Use this project to set a as-is assessment of Lift phones  An audit of the usability, condition, ownership of Lift Phones  

 

This table can be used through Business and Technical Analysis, Design, Build, and Testing/UAT as a Traceability Matrix to ensure the project brief project objectives and deliverables are followed through.

 

Requirements

 

Requirement User / Owner MoSCoW Associated Objective/Deliverable (Ox/Dx.x)
All lifts phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure Estates / IS Must O1/D1.1 and O2/D2.1
All emergency phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure Estates / IS Must O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2
All security team phones (UoE and ACE) are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure Terry Gillan Must O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2
The major incident room(s) phones are operable after power, UoE telephone and UoE network failure Terry Gillan Must O1/D1.2 and O2/D2.2
Clear Communication Plan and Execution thereof so all stakeholders are aware of the changes Maurice Franceschi Must O3/D3.1 and O3/D3.2
Refuge Phones are moved to the new resilient infrastructure Estates / Andy Mackay Could O4/D4.1
Updated or New process to ensure that lift and emergency phones are maintained and checked Estates Must O5/D5.1 and O5/D5.2

 

Benefits

Benefits management and realisation will be available on the ITI Sharepoint space.

By delivering the technical solution to provide full resilience to emergency and lift phones, the benefits to the University are of improved safety to staff, students and visitors should an emergency situation develop.

 

 

Governance

 

Project Board

 

The proposed project board - for approval by Project Sponsor  

Role Name Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title
Senior Owner Tony Weir Director ITI
Senior User

Alastair Reid

Karen Darling

Director H&S

Deputy Director H&S

Senior Supplier Dave Graham CIS Section Head, ITI
Other board members    
  Grant Ferguson Head of Estates Operations and Assistant Director, Estates
  Michelle Christian Assistant Director (Property & Residential Services), ACE
  Charles Hill Project and Planning Manager, CSG
     
     
     

 

Tolerances

The Project Board will be immediately informed and asked for approval if

  • the estimation for project budget increases by 10% or more ,
  • delivery milestones slip by a month or more,
  • if there is a change in scope

 

Resources Skills and Cost

Budget

£300K TBC

 

 

 

Priority and Funding

This is a highest category priority project for ISG. Priority 1.

Funding TBC by Estates and ISG.

 

Project Team

The installation of lines and phones will be carried out by the ISG CIS team members or commissioned contractors. The Health and Safety Management Team in Estates must be consulted about installation planes especially any work which is intrusive and may have implications for the management of Asbestos.  

The rest of the project team have the main task of helping with the communications from the project team to the community and stakeholders - in particular with messages to and meetings with building managers, local H&S and Fire and Security officers, and Heads of School or equivalent. This will include establishing 'golden copy' lists of buildings, lift phones and identified stakeholders.

The proposed project team - for approval by Project Sponsor

 

Role Name Division / Group / Team / College / School and Title
Project Manager Maurice Franceschi ITI, ITI Portfolio Manager
Technical Lead and other technicians Dave Graham ITI, Section Head CIS
  Ian Christie ITI, Service Manager
  Alan Rae ITI, Service Manager
Business Lead(s) Andy Mackay University Fire Safety Adviser, Health and Safety
  Sheila Scott Building Services Manager, Building Services
  Karen Darling   H&S, Deputy Director
  Joe Brannigan Health and Safety Advisor, Estates
  Terry Gillan Security Shift Manager, Security
Procurement Advisor   not required as framework for purchasing gateways in place
     
User(s) - who will help in analysis, testing and sign-offs Building Managers Local H&S Local Fire Local Securty  
     
     

 

Quality of Project and Deliverables / Key Project Milestones

 

User Acceptance Testing plans will be drawn up by the project team to confirm the various scenarios where power, phone network and data network may fail. In addition to the total loss of power or network, the UAT will include partial failures of phone and data network to see if the lift and emergency phones provide the resilience as anticipated.

Health and Safety are the Senior User and their sign-off of UAT is essential.

 

Outline plan

Pilot Phase

Main Task Estimated Date Actioned By
Approval of Project Brief, Planning, Communications 15/9/2017 Maurice Franceschi, Board
Delivery of Gateway and Implementation by Supplier TBC Dave Graham, Getronics
Internal testing by CIS of Lift and Emergency Phone configuration October CIS
Engagement with stakeholders for selected building to pilot : emails, website/sharepoint and meetings October Project Team / Board
Development and sign-off of UAT Plan October Project Team, Stakeholders, Board
Pilot : power outage, phone network failure and data network failure in selected buildings November CIS, Stakeholders
Review of outcomes : recommendation, estimates and plans to the Project Board for deployment across the Estate based on Pilot outcomes : decision on approach to take November/Dec Maurice Franceschi, Board
     

 

The project team proposes that we pilot these buildings for emergency and lift phones.  

Building Name and number

School

Head of School

Health and Safety Manager/Relevant Contact

 

Joseph Black Building/0632

Chemistry

Professor Colin Pulham

Phil McDonaldTechnical Services Manager Isobel Easedale, H&S Advisor

Arcadia Nursery/0678

ACE

Richard Kingston

The Manager : Karen Gilhooly  TBC

JCMB/0613

Multi-Occupancy

 

MOBUG Convener : Will Hossack

Alexander Graham Bell/0618

Engineering?

Professor Hugh McCann

Bryan Mitchell (with building team on copy)

Ashworth Labs/0640

Multi-Occupancy

 

MOBUG Convener : David Brown    

Grant Institute/Geology/Geophysics/0633

Geo-Sciences

Professor Simon Kelley

Graham Walker

 

The CIS team will default to providing an emergency phone at the reception area for a building - to be confirmed by a survey - or upgrading existing emergency phones.

Communication to the local stakeholders (Head of School, Building Owner, H&S, Fire, Security) will propose provision of emergency phones. The project team will arrange a meeting with representatives from the selected buildings.

Part of this communication is to make it clear that Laboratory phones are not Emergency phones and should be upgraded to Standard VOIP handset.

We will trial this communication approach at KB Pilot and if successful would intend to continue in this way for full deployment across the estate.

 

The Project Team will provide Golden Copy information on all lifts and building profile.

The Project Board will provide approve the buildings which are to have one (or more) Emergency Phones in or none.

 

 

There are two approaches once Pilot has proven successful and we can estimate time and effort and cost- the project team will ask the project board to select the option to be chosen after the pilot is completed successfully.  

Deployment to the Estate - Option 1

Only upgrade the Lift Phones - pilot at KB then whole Estate Once competed, start on Emergency phones  

Deployment to the Estate - Option 2

Upgrade the Lift Phones and Emergency Phones

 

 

Milestone Sign-Off means Date of Milestone Who signs-off (Accountability)
Start of Project
Project can begin, is in line with Programme and Portfolio priority, has resource
10/7/2017
Sponsor, Programme Manager
End of Planning
Project Brief, Plan, Estimated Budget, Risks, Communication Plan - all approved. Project has resource approved by section head for the estimated effort. Project has funding for effort for other costs.
31/8/2017
Sponsor, PM, Programme Manager, Section Head(s)
KB Pilot      
End of Analysis for the Pilot quality and completeness of analysis for what is needed for the pilot at KB   business analyst / business lead / senior user / PM
End of Design for the Pilot quality and completeness of technical design for lift and emergency phones cabled to the new gateway providing resilience   technical lead / senior supplier/ business lead / senior user/ PM
End of Build for the Pilot quality and completeness of build - lift and emergency phones are in place and ready for user acceptance testing   technical lead / senior supplier/ PM
Communication to Stakeholders Written and Meeting with key stakeholders for the selected buildings for the Pilot    
Acceptance
Lift Phones survive 3 hours and can make and receive calls to designated numbers (several scenarios)
Emergency Phones survive 3 hours and can make and receive calls to designated numbers (several scenarios)
 
 
CIS and Estates Representatives
 
       
Deployment to UoE/ACE   TBC  
Decide Approach Project Board    
Replanning and Estimates      
       

 

Assumptions

The Key Assumption being made is the Profile of an Emergency Phone and Profile of a Lift Phone (as above). This drives the requirements.

We assume our information on buildings and lifts is up to date.

We are making the assumption that around 250 buildings will require one emergency phone.

 

 

Constraints

There are no known constraints on the project

 

Risks

Due to the sensitivity of the information, this project will share its documentation, risks and issues on Sharepoint. The current risks are listed in the CIS010 Project Logs. The project website will only be used for high level milestones and project brief and high level project progress reports.

 

 

Issues

Due to the sensitivity of the information, this project will share its documentation, risks and issues on Sharepoint.

 

Previous Lessons Learned

Important that what is Out of Scope is understood and agreed at the project start - project board has this responsibility.

From the CIS001 VOIP replacement project, we know that meeting are much more effective in clarity and engagement  than any email communication, even from senior management.

 

Dependencies

No dependencies on other project.

CIS001 VOIP replacement is dependant on this project to allow it to decommission analogue telephony network and to replace Laboratory and other 'emergency' phone handsets with VOIP.

 

Version Control

Project Documentation will adopt the following convention 

  • Documentation in development will be version 0.x or 1.x
  • Documentation submitted for Approval will be version 2.x
  • Documentation signed-off as complete will be version 3.0
  • And changes to the document will be change managed and result in version 3.x  

 

 

Communication

 

The communication for the project will be a key element in its success.

The outline may be summarised as Stakeholder : -

Project Team to help with initial communication to the Head of School/equivalent to set up meeting with key stakeholders of buildings effected to explain what is to be done and importantly, not in scope Project Board to deal with escalations from stakeholders

 

Project Board :- monthly report from project manager project board meetings : after pilot to KB is complete and then every four months during full deployment TBC) escalations when tolerances breached or critical risks and issues are raised

                          

The Communication Plan will be on Sharepoint and set out the comms for the project - as planned and as executed.

 

 

 

Run / Grow / Transform

This a Grow project

 

Alignment with Strategic Vision  

Guidance (please remove)

This project will deliver benefits, change and innovations in alignment with the IS Strategic Vision and the University's Strategic Vision for 2025. ** Check the Annual Plan on ITI Sharepoint to see how the project's deliverables and benefits have been aligned to Run/Grow/Transform and the Strategic Themes **

IS Strategic Vision the main elements of the vision that this projects contibutes to are highlighted in bold.

Student Experience

Commentary
Student experience and the unique Edinburgh offer x
Online and distance learning leaders  
Library national and international leadership  
   

Research and Innovation

 
Research IT and Data Sciences  
Innovation  
Collaborative leadership  and social responsibility  
   

Service Excellence

 
Process improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice x
Long‐term IS strategic planning and linked professional services  
Information Security  

 

University's Strategic Vision for 2025 the main elements of the vision that this projects contributes to are highlighted in bold.

Vision Themes Commentary
A unique Edinburgh offer for all of our students  
• all of our undergraduates developed as student/ researchers with clear, supported pathways through to Masters and PhD  
• all our students offered the opportunity to draw from deep expertise outside their core discipline  
• a highly satisfied student body with a strong sense of community.  
   
Strong and vibrant communities within and beyond the University – making the most of our unique offer of world-leading thinking and learning within one of the world’s most attractive cities  
   
A larger, more international,staff who feel valued and supported in a University that is a great and collegial place to work, develop and progress  
   
More postgraduate students – underpinned by the best support in the sector to ensure we attract the brightest and best regardless of ability to pay  
   
   
   
A strong culture of philanthropic support focussed especially on our students and on outstanding research capabilities.  
   
Many more students benefiting from the Edinburgh experience (largely or entirely) in their own country – supported by deep international partnerships and world- leading online distance learning  
   
Sustained world leading reputation for the breadth, depth and interdisciplinarity of our research supported by strong growth in research funding and strong international partnerships – drawing from well-established and less well developed sources

 

   
An estate that matches expectations, responds flexibly to changing student and staff needs, and showcases the University

x

   

A deeper and earlier collaboration with industry, the public sector and the third sector – in terms of research; knowledge exchange; and in giving our students the best possible set of skills for their future

 
   

 

 

Digital Transformation Commentary
Describe how the changes this project delivers will contribute to the digitial transformation of the Service                  n/a            

 

 

IS Change Programme - How will this project's Deliverables and Benefits promote the Themes  

Guidance (please remove)

Indicate if the project deliverables and benefits contribute to the themes with the IS Change Programme.

 

IS Change Programme Theme How the project deliverables and benefits contribute to change
Project Management  
Working Together  
Standards and Technical Leadership  
Staff Learning and Development  
Service Based Culture X
Equality and Diversity X
Partnerships and Philanthropy  
Flexible Resourcing  
Communication and Branding

 

 

Service Excellence - Information and Security

n/a

 

Service Excellence - Process Improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice (Social Responsibility and and Sustainability)

n/a

 

Digital Transformation

n/a

 

IS Change Programme - How will the execution of this project promote the Themes

 

IS Change Programme Theme How the project process will contribute to change
Project Management  
Working Together

 

The project involves many colleagues in ISG, Estates, Corporate and Colleges working together

 

Standards and Technical Leadership  
Staff Learning and Development

 

 

 

Service Based Culture

 

 

Equality and Diversity

 

 

Partnerships and Philanthropy

 

 

Flexible Resourcing

 

The project has been helped by the use of students to conduct a survey of the estate's lifts

 

Communication and Branding

 

communication in the project should improve cross-divisional understanding

 

 

 

Project Sponsor – Project Responsibilities

The sign-off milestones are associated with specific responsibilities of the Sponsor role .

Start of project – Explicitly Included in the Initiation Milestones Sign-Off

  1. Negotiates and confirms funding for the project
  2. Ensures the project is in line with organisational strategy and priorities
  3. Chairs the project board, appoints its members and ensures they are effective
  4. Advises the project manager of protocols, political risks, issues and sensitivities
  5. Makes the project visible within the organisation  

End of Planning – Explicitly Included in the Planning Milestone Sign-Off

  1. Works with the project manager to develop the Project Brief
  2. Ensures a realistic project plan is produced
  3. Sets tolerance levels for escalation to themselves and to the project board
  4. Ensures that project team have representation and engagement from users and suppliers
  5. Helps identify Stakeholders
  6. Approves Communication Plan
  7. Agrees on frequency of meetings with Project Manager
  8. Agrees of frequency of meetings with Project Team
  9. Agrees on milestones and who signs-off

 

Execution – ongoing

  1. Provides strategic direction and guidance to the project manager as directed by the Board
  2. Approves changes to plans, priorities, deliverables, schedule
  3. Encourages stakeholder involvement and maintains their ongoing commitment
  4. Chief risk taker
  5. Makes go/no-go decisions
  6. Communicates change in organisational structure, priorities, business benefits or funding
  7. Helps the project manager in conflict resolution
  8. Helps resolve inter project boundary issues
  9. Gains agreement among stakeholders when differences of opinion occur
  10. Assists the project by exerting organisational authority and the ability to influence  

Delivery – Explicitly Included in the Delivery Sign-Off

  1. Ensures that Service is ready for change

 

Closure - Explicitly Included in the Closure Milestone Sign-Off

 

  1. Helps with publicity for the change delivered
  2. Ensure that benefits will be managed, measured and realised post-project
  3. Evaluates the project’s success upon completion

Project Info

Not available.

Documentation

Not available.