Project Brief
Approvals
Name | Role | Position | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Tony Weir | Project Sponsor | Director, Information Technology Infrastructure | 01/11/2019 |
Dave Graham | Senior Supplier | Head, ITI Communication Infrastructure Services | 08/11/2019* |
Stefan Kämpf | Senior User | Team Leader, ISG Production Management | 06/11/2019 |
Graeme Wood | Senior User | Head, ITI Enterprise Services | 12/11/2019 |
David Fergusson | Senior User | Head, ITI Research Services Support | |
Maurice Franceschi | CIS Programme Manager | ITI Portfolio Manager, ISG Project Services | 31/10/2019 |
Lawrence Stevenson | Project Manager | ITI Project Manager, ISG Project Services | 31/10/2019 |
* = Approved by Fraser Mckenzie in the absence of David Graham
Distribution
Name | Position |
---|---|
Fraser McKenzie | Network Manager, ITI Communication Infrastructure Services |
Murray Dippie | ESW Team Leader, ITI Enterprise Services |
Martin Campbell | Unix Systems Team Leader, ITI Enterprise Services |
Kenneth MacDonald | Unix Services Team Leader, ITI Enterprise Services |
Mike Wallis | Support Team Lead, ITI Research Services Support |
Craig Morris | Snr Systems Administrator, Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre (EPCC) |
Ian Durkacz | Computing Officer, School of Informatics |
Belinda Haig | Scottish Rural College (SRUC |
Background
This project brief describes the objectives, scope, timeline, deliverables and acceptance criteria for the upgrade of the networking infrastructure in the JCMB and Appleton Tower datacentres managed by ITI Communication Infrastructure Services (CIS). The goal of the project is to upgrade and optimise networking in the data centres to more effectively support access to the University’s business critical administration and research systems.
Project Scope
The project will upgrade the data network infrastructure in the University's data centres at JCMB and Appleton Tower. The scope covers the replacement of EOL 1GigE switches and consolidation of others in the data halls. The scope covers all switches, apart from the Brocade 10GigE switches, recently installed at the data centres. The switches in comms/server rooms in secure corridors at AT/JCMB are to be assessed to ascertain if they are in scope. The replacement of switches will potentially be a mix of new and existing, recycled (e.g. HP 5130-48) switches to meet budget limitations.
The switch inventory at the data centres has been updated and is being used to plan and track the switch replacement work. The project will run in parallel with CIS014 - Network Infrastructure Deployment, but is not part of that programme, but may benefit from project synergies such as discounts on new switch equipment from the main contractor on CIS014.
There is potential to synchronise with network management/monitoring work that will be ongoing during the project. This system will be implemented as part of the CIS014 project.
Further plans and documentation will stored at the project SharePoint site. Project tasks are managed and tracked on the Jira Kanban dashboard.
Out of Scope
The project does not cover the replacement of any network switches outside the data centre. It should be noted that the larger network programme (CIS014 – Network Infrastructure Deployment) will run in parallel to deliver data network infrastructure and services to buildings in the University’s estate outside the data centres.
The project will not include ENT VMware hosts which are currently being migrated to the Brocade 10GigE network as part of ENT026 – VMware Service Improvement.
Objectives
The key requirements of the FY2019-20 Data Centre Network project are listed below. The expectation is that the work will be completed before the end of the 2019-20 financial year in July 2020.
Requirement | MoSCoW Rating | Requester |
---|---|---|
Replace all EOL 1GigE network switches in the data centres with 1GigE or 10GigE switches as required | Must | Tony Weir |
Recycle any supported switches if the budget does not support full replacement | Should | Dave Graham |
Ensure all network switches are paired for fault tolerance, where required, by dual connections to servers | Must |
Graeme Wood, David Fergusson |
Switch utilisation is optimised to ensure effective deployment of equipment | Should | Dave Graham |
Configure, connect and test all server, storage and other equipment in the data centres to the new network infrastructure | Must |
Graeme Wood, David Fergusson |
All switches managed and monitored by the CIS network management systems implemented by CIS014 | Must | Dave Graham |
Update and maintain a concurrent switch inventory in the data centres, if not supported by the proposed network management system | Should | Dave Graham |
Develop and maintain up to date network schematics for both data centres, if not supported by the proposed network management system | Should | Dave Graham |
Remove, recycle (where appropriate) and dispose of all legacy switches, cabling, etc. | Must | Dave Graham |
Deliverables
The following deliverables and acceptance criteria to meet the objectives of the project are outlined in the following table.
Objective | Deliverable(s) | Acceptance Criteria |
---|---|---|
Replace all EOL 1GigE network switches in the data centres | New switch pairs installed in racks to replace existing kit, configured, tested and operational | Switches confirmed as operational in primary and failover states on test servers and other equipment |
Ensure all service owners supported by ENT and RSS systems are appraised and approve of dates and activity required for the network upgrade | No Enterprise or Research business application is impacted by a loss of service during the switch migration process | Service owners agree to planned dates in advance; no loss of service is encountered during migration |
Recycle any supported switches if the budget does not support full replacement | Existing switches installed as pairs in racks, configured, tested and operational | Switches confirmed as operational in primary and failover states on test servers and other equipment |
Ensure all network switches are paired for fault tolerance, if applicable | Paired switches configured for dual operation, as required | Run switch fail-over tests on test servers to confirm redundancy is in place |
Switch utilisation is optimised to ensure economic deployment of equipment | Switches configured to ensure ports are adequately utilised | 50%+ utilisation of switch ports wherever viable |
Configure, connect and test all server, storage and other equipment in the data centres to the new network infrastructure | All designated server and other equipment, development, test and live, operating on the new network infrastructure | Confirmation that all servers etc. are connected and operating as specified on the new network switches |
All switches managed and monitored by the CIS network management systems | Network management and monitoring systems include all data centre networking equipment | Management and monitoring of data centre network equipment in operation |
Update and maintain a concurrent switch inventory in the data centres | Up to date inventory of all data centre network equipment | Processes in place to review and update inventory as changes are made; ease in connecting new equipment to the network |
Develop and maintain up to date network schematics for both data centres | Up to date schematics for both data centres showing all network equipment and connectivity | Process in place to review and update network diagrams when changes are made |
Remove, recycle (where appropriate) and dispose of all legacy switches, cabling, etc. | All decommissioned network equipment removed from the data centres and passed to recycling/disposal services | Formal recycling and/or disposal forms received from support services |
Success Criteria
The following are the criteria to be met to ensure a successful completion of the project –
- Reduction in risk with improved network services at the JCMB and Appleton Tower data centres
- Ease in the installation for new equipment to be connected to the data centre network and in moving existing equipment on the networks
- Improved processes, management systems and documentation to manage and monitor the data centre networks
- No major disruption or loss of service to systems impacted by the switch migration
Benefits
The successful delivery of this project is expected to provide the following benefits -
- All networking equipment in the data centres is within warranty and under vendor support
- Paired switches deliver across the board resilience and improved business service levels
- Minimises installation and maintenance costs through effective port planning and utilisation
- The data centre networks are managed and monitored within the wider University network management systems
- Network switch inventory and schematics are up to date and managed
- All decommissioned equipment is recycled and disposed of effectively
Project Governance
The project will be managed using the standard ISG ITI project management framework and processes.
A project board will not be constituted. This was agreed by senior stakeholders at the initial project review. Day to day project management and delivery is the responsibility of the project team – see the section - Project Team. The project team will meet on a fortnightly basis.
Project Board
The senior stakeholders of this project have indicated that a project board will not be created for this project. Any escalations from the project meetings will be raised directly with the Senior Supplier or Senior Users, as appropriate.
Tolerances
The following standard ITI project tolerances will be applied and these are outline below. Any deviation outside these tolerances must be reported to the senior stakeholders for review and resolution.
- Cost – over +/- 10% of original budget
- Plan – slippage of over 4 weeks to current plan
- Scope – extensive addition or reduction from current scope
- Quality – refusal to approve a key project deliverable
Resources, Skills and Costs
Budget
A capital budget of £80,000 has been assigned to this project. Cost estimates will be prepared during the design and migration planning stage. However, it is expected that a significant number of switches will need to be replaced which will require some level of capital investment. Where possible existing supported switches will be recycled to reduce investments costs. Additional investment will also be required for new cabling, racking kit and, possibly, patch panel. As currently, it is envisaged that the project will run with internal resources, no investment is predicted for external consultancy or contracts.
Revenue costs, covering items such as maintenance and support costs for the new switches and other equipment and any additional licencing costs for the network management systems, will be covered by operational budgets,
It is estimated that the project will run from October 2019 to July 2020 and will require significant ITI CIS staff involvement for network design, planning, procurement, installation, configuration, test and implementation work. In addition, ITI ENT support will be required for data centre planning, systems design, planning, configuration, test and implementation phases.
Priority and Funding
This work has been identified as a Priority 3 project providing Growth within the ITI portfolio. An initial budget of £80,000 has been approved for purchase of new switches and related equipment. A more accurate estimated of projects costs will be submitted the design work is completed. Estimates will be obtained under the framework negotiated with EE for the CIS014 project.
Project Team
The following diagram shows the key members of the Data Centre Networking (CIS015) project team. Their roles and responsibilities are outlined in this section.
Roles and estimated high-level resource requirements are itemised in the table below for all project contributors.
Team Member | Role | Days Allocated |
---|---|---|
Tony Weir | Project Sponsor; confirmation of scope, approval of project brief and plan, approval of requested budgets; liaison with senior service owners and senior management on project; resolves major issues and risks |
3.0 |
Dave Graham | Senior Supplier; provides ITI CIS resource for design, planning, procurement, installation, configuration, test and implementation phases; escalates risks and issues; submits costs for budget approval; resolves or escalates key risks and issues; approves phase exits updates to project sponsor; resolves and escalates issues and risks, as appropriate |
10.0 |
Stefan Kämpf | Senior User; provides ISG Production Management resources for planning, test and implementation phases; resolves or escalates key risks and issues; approves phase exits; resolves and escalates issues and risks, as appropriate | 5.0 |
Graeme Wood | Senior User; provides ITI ENT resources for design, planning, installation, test and implementation; resolves or escalates key risks and issues; approves phase exits; resolves and escalates issues and risks, as appropriate | 5.0 |
David Fergusson | Senior User; provides ITI RSS resources for design, planning, installation, test and implementation; resolves or escalates key risks and issues; approves phase exits; approve POs against budget | 5.0 |
Production Management Analyst TBA | Identifies key applications and dates were services may be impacted by server migrations to the new network infrastructure; liaise with service owners on dates and reschedule if needed; tests application services are operational after system switchovers to the new network | 10.0 |
Fraser McKenzie (CIS - Network Planner) | Leads design process in terms of network design, cost estimates, equipment selection, rack placement, migration planning, impact analysis, procurement process, CIS014 and vendor liaison; prepares design documents and schematics; manages switch inventory; identifies risk and issues | 20.0 |
Stewart McKeon (CIS - Network Engineer) | Leads and supports preparation for installation of switches, cabling, switch installation, configuration, connection to test servers, full implementation, disposal of legacy equipment; updates network management system; updates operational documents; identifies risk and issues | 30.0 |
Paul Hutton (ENT - Data Centre Planning) | Supports rack installation planning for ENT equipment; estimates any related data centre infrastructure costs; identifies risk and issues | 8.0 |
Andy Garman (ENT– Systems Planning) | Identifies ENT impacted systems, contributes to design and migration planning; estimates any ENT system related costs; identifies risk and issues | 8.0 |
Paul Hutton, Andy Garman (ENT - Systems Engineering) | Supports installation, configuration and connection of ENT servers in test and implementation phases; identifies risk and issues | 16.0 |
Stephen Giles, Jan Winter (RSS – Data Centre Planning) | Supports rack installation planning for RSS equipment; estimates any related data centre infrastructure costs; identifies risk and issues | 4.0 |
Stephen Giles, Jan Winter (RSS – Systems Planning) | Identifies RSS impacted systems, contributes to design and migration planning; estimates any RSS system related costs; identifies risk and issues | 8.0 |
Stephen Giles, Jan Winter (RSS – Systems Engineering) | Supports installation, configuration and connection of RSS servers in test and implementation phases; identifies risk and issues | 15.0 |
Maurice Franceschi | CIS programme management; identifies external project dependencies; escalates major project related risk and issues | 5.0 |
Lawrence Stevenson | Project management; development of project brief; preparation and updating of project plan; estimation of overall project costs and resources, tracks costs and resource actuals; manages risks and issues within project, escalates as required; manages internal and external project dependencies; chairs project meeting; produces project closure report | 40.0 |
In addition, ad hoc support may be required from ISG Business Admin for procurement activity and ISG Finance to provide support in developing and maintaining the project cost model.
Project Milestones
The following table outlines the key milestones in the project. The initial dates assume that procurement of new equipment will be managed using the CIS014 framework. The project will highlight any changes that may impact services by early communication to the service owners of the systems affected and through the normal change management processes.
Milestone | Responsible | Approval | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Initial review of scope and requirements completed | Dave Graham | Tony Weir | 27/09/2019 |
Project brief and project plan drafted | Lawrence Stevenson |
Dave Graham, Maurice Franceschi |
11/10/2019 |
Core project team members confirmed | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, Stefan Kämpf | Tony Weir | 25/10/2019 |
Project brief and plan reviewed and approved | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, Stefan Kämpf, Maurice Franceschi | Tony Weir | 25/10/2019 |
End of planning | Lawrence Stevenson | Maurice Franceschi | 31/10/2019 |
Initial project communications issued | Dave Graham | Tony Weir | 08/11/2019 |
Design completed; initial costs estimated | Fraser McKenzie, Paul Hutton, Andy Garman, Stephen Giles, Jan Winter | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, | 22/11/2019 |
Migration plan completed | Fraser McKenzie, Paul Hutton, Andy Garman, Stephen Giles, Jan Winter, Production Management Analyst | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, Stefan Kämpf | 20/12/2019 |
Xmas Break | 23/12/2019 - 03/01/2020 | ||
Migration plan published | Stefan Kämpf | Service owners | 17/01/2019 |
Quotes received (EE), costs calculated | Fraser McKenzie | Dave Graham | 17/01/2019 |
Purchase order placed (EE framework) | Fraser McKenzie | Dave Graham | 31/01/2019 |
New switches delivered | Fraser McKenzie | Dave Graham | 28/02/2019 |
Test installations/connections start (ENT) |
Stewart McKeon, Andy Garman |
Dave Graham, Graeme Wood |
02/03/2020 |
Migration dates confirmed | Stefan Kämpf | Service Owners | 13/03/2019 |
Test installations completed and approved (ENT) | Stewart McKeon, Andy Garman | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood | 20/03/2020 |
Full installations and migrations start (ENT, RSS) | Fraser McKenzie, Paul Hutton, Andy Garman, Stephen Giles, Jan Winter, Production Management Analyst | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, Stefan Kämpf | 23/03/2020 |
Easter Break | 16/04/2020 - 17/04/2020 | ||
Examinations | 27/04/2020 - 22/05/2020 | ||
Full migrations completed and approved (ENT, RSS) | Fraser McKenzie, Paul Hutton, Andy Garman, Stephen Giles, Jan Winter, Production Management Analyst | Dave Graham, Graeme Wood, David Fergusson, Stefan Kämpf | 15/05/2020 |
Project closed | Lawrence Stevenson |
Tony Weir, Dave Graham, Maurice Franceschi |
19/06/2020 |
Work Breakdown
The following work breakdown chart summarises tasks required to deliver the upgrade of the networking infrastructure at the JCMB and Appleton Tower data centres.
* = possible option
Project Timeline
The table below shows in outline the estimated times for the main tasks in the project.
Task | Duration | Start | Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Project initiation | 20 | 02/09/2019 | 27/09/2019 |
|
20 | 02/09/2019 | 27/09/2019 |
Project planning | 20 | 30/09/2019 | 25/10/2019 |
|
10 | 30/09/2019 | 11/10/2019 |
|
5 | 14/10/2019 | 18/10/2019 |
|
5 | 21/10/2019 | 25/10/2019 |
|
3 | 21/10/2019 | 23/10/2019 |
|
2 | 24/10/2019 | 25/10/2019 |
Publish scope/impact/timeline | 10 | 28/10/2019 | 08/11/2019 |
Project design/migration planning | 40 | 28/10/2019 | 20/12/2019 |
|
5 | 28/10/2019 | 01/11/2019 |
|
5 | 28/10/2019 | 01/11/2019 |
|
5 | 04/11/2019 | 08/11/2019 |
|
5 | 11/11/2019 | 15/11/2019 |
|
5 | 18/11/2019 | 22/11/2019 |
|
5 | 25/11/2019 | 29/11/2019 |
|
5 | 25/11/2019 | 29/11/2019 |
|
5 | 02/12/2019 | 06/12/2019 |
|
10 | 09/12/2019 | 20/12/2019 |
Publish migration plan | 10 | 06/01/2020 | 17/01/2020 |
Procurement | 40 | 06/01/2020 | 28/02/2020 |
|
10 |
06/01/2020 | 17/01/2020 |
|
10 | 20/01/2020 | 31/01/2020 |
|
20 | 03/02/2020 | 28/02/2020 |
Publish migration dates | 10 | 02/03/2020 | 13/03/2020 |
Test migration | 15 | 02/03/2020 | 20/03/2020 |
|
5 | 02/03/2020 | 06/03/2020 |
|
5 | 09/03/2020 | 13/03/2020 |
|
5 | 16/03/2020 | 20/03/2020 |
Full migration | 40 | 23/03/2020 | 15/05/2020 |
|
10 | 23/03/2020 | 03/04/2020 |
|
10 | 06/04/2020 | 17/04/2020 |
|
20 | 20/04/2020 | 15/05/2020 |
Project closure | 25 | 18/05/2020 | 19/06/2020 |
|
10 | 18/05/2020 | 29/05/2020 |
|
5 | 01/06/2020 | 05/06/2020 |
|
5 | 08/06/2020 | 12/06/2020 |
|
5 | 15/06/2020 | 19/06/2020 |
The proposed project timeline is shown below.
Assumptions
The following assumptions have been identified at the start of the project and may be expanded during the project.
- The resources estimated for the project will be available as scheduled to ensure the work assigned in the project plan is completed on time
- The bulk of critical Enterprise Services systems (virtual hosting) will be migrated to the Brocade 10GigE network for data traffic by end-2019, before any installation work on this project, and so the scope will cover user traffic, database traffic, any less critical applications and management and monitoring traffic on the 1GigE network
- The bulk of critical Research Services systems are already on the 10GigE RDM network for data traffic and so the scope will cover user traffic, less critical applications and management and monitoring traffic on the 1GigE network
- ISG Production Management will be required to plan and monitor applications services when servers are migrated to the new switches
- Project costs once estimated will be approved
- The project will align with CIS014 – Network Infrastructure Deployment and share dependencies and synergies e.g. EE framework
- Equipment lead-time is estimated at one month
- All operational documentation and management systems in scope will be update, as required
Constraints
The main constraint for the project is that CIS, ENT and RSS team members will not be fully assigned to the project and will be working on other projects and supporting BAU activities. This can be translated into a key risk were precedence for resources may go to the CIS014 project, critical BAU work or work on another higher priority project. Management will prioritise resource for this project to achieve project timescales as per resource plan, whilst recognising operational requirements and wider programme commitments.
Additionally, if it is a management goal to ensure project costs are covered by an FY2019-20 budget, this mean that procurement of equipment, delivery and payment must be completed by July 2020.
Risks
The risk log will be maintained to record and track all risks to resolution. Risk severity and impact, risk owner and planned mitigation date will be assigned by the project team. Major risks with proximity need to be escalated to the project sponsor.
Initial risks that have been identified for this project include –
- The project resource requirements, and hence planned dates, may not be met due to the volume of work in other areas e.g. CIS014 within the CIS and ENT team
- The scope of work in terms of impacted systems and services is yet to be completed in detail, so that the current plans require revision if approval from a service owner for migration of a service is rejected due to business risk e.g. applications process, exams.
- The overall project costs may not be covered by the indicative budget (£80K) so all impacted switches may not be able to be replaced. The mitigation will be to reuse existing HP5130-48 switches were new switches are not available.
Issues
If they arise, issues will be recorded, on the Projects website, and tracked throughout the project. Issues that are not outside agreed tolerances will be resolved within the project team. Major issues need to be escalated to the appropriate senior stakeholder for review and advice on resolution. Issue resolution that requires a major change to the project in terms of time, quality or cost needs to be approved under formal change management by the senior stakeholders.
All project changes outside tolerances must be reviewed and approved by the project sponsor. Project changes within tolerances can be managed with the project team.
Project work that impacts production systems or networks must be communicated with the requisite lead time to the ISG CAB for review and approval.
Lessons Learned
A log will be maintained on the Projects website to record lessons learned throughout the project. This will be reviewed at the project closure meeting and will be available for review by future projects.
It is noted that anecdotal lesson learned from the project CISX05 - Brocade Fabric 10G Network include –
- The work was not treated as a project in the first instance so scope, goals, requirements, dates, etc. were not reviewed and agreed
- Design and implementation issues delayed the project, with multiple redesigns attempted
- A reduce scope networking solution was delivered
- Connection of systems to the 10Gbs network was not include in the project work or timeline
Initiating this project using formal methods to ensure scope, plans, resourcing and budgets are agreed in the planning and design phases of the project should ensure the slippage and de-scoping will, if not minimised, be managed formally and effectively.
Dependencies
The project will run in parallel with the University’s network replacement programme, CIS014, but is not considered part of that programme. However, this project will benefit from synergies from the larger programme which may include –
- Network design and delivery standards
- Discounted framework pricing on equipment
- CIS and other resources working on both projects
The two project teams will also have to coordinate in the areas where the new network equipment will be integrated.
Currently no dependencies have been identified with other ongoing ITI projects. Any planned outages or risks to services will be communication to service owners for their review and approval well in advance of any changes.
Communication
The following meetings and communication channels will be put in place to support the effective communication of project progress, risk management and escalation.
Forum | Frequency | Participants/Recipients | Communication |
---|---|---|---|
Project Board | Not required | ||
Project Meeting | Fortnightly | Project team members and Project Manager | Meeting minutes, plan, risks & issues |
Project Report | Monthly | Project Manager/All stakeholders | Project website |
Project announcements & updates | As required | Project Manager or Senior Supplier, as appropriate | |
ISG CAB | As required | Senior Supplier/CAB Members | CAB submissions |
Project progress |
Monthly at least |
Project manager/stakeholders |
Updated project plan, Jira dashboard |
Run/Grow/Transform
This project will contribute to the growth of ITI services with the delivery of more robust, resilient and supported network infrastructure within the data centres at JCMB and Appleton Tower.
Alignment with ISG Strategic Vision
This section defines how the areas of the upgraded data centre infrastructure aligns with the ISG’s strategic vision.
Vision | Commentary |
---|---|
Student Experience | |
Student experience and the unique Edinburgh offer | Provides more reliable network access to teaching and other student systems. |
Online and distance learning leaders | Provides more reliable network access to online services and distance learning systems. |
Library national and international leadership | Provides more reliable network access to library systems to underpin excellence in library services. |
Research and Innovation | |
Research IT and Data Sciences | Provides more reliable network access to research systems to support excellence in research. |
Innovation | Provides more reliable network access to leading-edge services (e.g. IoT) and systems to support excellence in innovation. |
Collaborative leadership and social responsibility | The project will not directly impact ISG’s collaborative leadership goals but will support its social responsibility objectives by the safe, sustainable and secure disposal of decommissioned equipment. |
Service Excellence | |
Process improvement, efficiency, quality and best practice | The data centre infrastructure will integrate with the new University network, using the latest switch equipment and integrating into campus-wide network management processes and systems. |
Long-term IS strategic planning and linked professional services | The project supports long-term IS strategy by providing improved, more secure and robust data centre networks. It does not contribute directly to improving or expanding the ISG’s professional services. |
Information Security | The new data centre networks will provide a more secure infrastructure supporting the University’s systems and services. |
Alignment with IS Change Programme
The following table shows the Data Centre Networking project contributes to the themes that underpin the University’s change programme.
IS Change Programme Theme | Contribution |
---|---|
Project Management | ISG ITI project management processes and methods being used to deliver this project. |
Working Together | The project team will include representatives from ISG Production Management, ITI CIS, ITI ENT and ITI RSS as well as support from ISG Business Administration and ISG Finance. The composition of the project team is such as to ensure all the required skills were available to ensure the delivery of a quality network infrastructure on time and under budget. A wide-ranging design and planning exercise will be undertaken to ensure tasks, assignments, duration and priorities are well defined, accepted and assigned. |
Standards and Technical Leadership | CIS015 (Data Centre Networking) is being developed, in parallel with CIS014 (Network Infrastructure Deployment), to deliver a robust and up to date network infrastructure for the University’s data centres. |
Staff Learning and Development | The project will provide members of the team with exposure to the latest networking technologies and equipment. This project gives them an opportunity to further develop their core skills and expertise. The project team will also benefit from planning and delivering a service using formal project management practices. |
Service Based Culture | Collaboration with the ISG Production Management team during the project will ensure the project is service focussed. |
Equality and Diversity | The University’s equality policies will be followed by all team members in all communications, meetings and other channels used in the project. |
Flexible Resourcing | It is assumed that, in the main, all project team members will not be working full-time on the project. This presents an increased requirement for detailed planning and commitment from senior stakeholders that assigned resources are available as indicated and agreed in the project plan. |
Communication and Branding | A general communication plan is outlined in a previous section. The planning and delivery of the new network infrastructure will be communicated to the University’s service communities via alerts and other channels at key points throughout the project. |
Service Excellence
Information and Security
The network infrastructure will be integrated into the current security infrastructure with firewall configurations replicated, upgraded, and hardened, where necessary, providing improved security controls around the University’s systems and data.
Improved physical security around access to the data centres is not in the scope of the project but enhance to cabinet level security will be considered when redesigning rack layouts.
Process Improvement
The project will deliver network infrastructures in both data centres that integrate effectively with the wider planned network replacement initiative and contribute to the improved network management processes and systems that will be delivered.
The disposal of all decommissioned equipment will follow standard University and ISG policies for the safe, sustainable and secure disposal of kit.
Digital Transformation
The project will deliver a network infrastructure which transforms the current environment into one which provides more secure, robust and reliable data centre networks to support the systems that use it and the data that follows through it.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 39.4 KB |
![]() | 71.93 KB |
![]() | 50.86 KB |